These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8165921)

  • 21. Automatic and imperative motor activations in stimulus-response compatibility: magnetoencephalographic analysis of upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 16078021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Eliminating the Simon effect by instruction.
    Theeuwes M; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1470-1480. PubMed ID: 24884648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cross-task compatibility and age-related dual-task performance.
    Grabbe JW; Allen PA
    Exp Aging Res; 2012; 38(5):469-87. PubMed ID: 23092219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A role for set in the control of automatic spatial response activation.
    Risko EF; Besner D
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18271352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of face and inanimate-object contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Pick DF; Specker S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 24065284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispheric sensitivity to body stimuli in simple reaction time.
    Aziz-Zadeh L; Iacoboni M; Zaidel E
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 170(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Stoffer TH
    Psychol Res; 1991; 53(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 1946872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Difference in stimulus-response compatibility effect in premotor and motor time between upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):939-46. PubMed ID: 9885062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of stimulus-response compatibility on cortical motor activation.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Zhu XH; Ugurbil K; Kim SG; Ashe J
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jan; 13(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11133304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of anatomical factors and spatial compatibility on the stimulus-response relationship in the absence of the corpus callosum.
    Di Stefano M; Sauerwein HC; Lassonde M
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Feb; 30(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 1560895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simon's experiments and stimulus-response compatibility: hypothesis of two automatic responses.
    Ghozlan A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Feb; 84(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 9132731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.
    Marini M; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 21592943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).
    Braun CM; Larocque C; Achim A
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):442-56. PubMed ID: 15292975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.
    Bächtold D; Baumüller M; Brugger P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Aug; 36(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 9751438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Practice-induced and sequential modulations of the Simon effect.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):895-911. PubMed ID: 20436188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Psychol Res; 2010 Mar; 74(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 19214563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Riehle A; Kornblum S; Requin J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1708-26. PubMed ID: 9425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.