These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8165921)

  • 61. Similarities and differences between interference from stimulus position and from direction of an arrow: behavioral and event-related potential measures.
    Cespón J; Galdo-Álvarez S; Díaz F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 23856354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
    Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Trajectory deviations in spatial compatibility tasks with peripheral and central stimuli.
    Welsh TN; Pacione SM; Neyedli HF; Ray M; Ou J
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):650-7. PubMed ID: 25009311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes?
    Cooper RP; Catmur C; Heyes C
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(4):605-30. PubMed ID: 22578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Atypical biological kinematics are represented during observational practice.
    Foster NC; Bennett SJ; Causer J; Bird G; Andrew M; Hayes SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29809051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Differential dynamics of spatial and non-spatial stimulus-response compatibility effects: a dual task LRP study.
    Lehle C; Cohen A; Sangals J; Sommer W; Stürmer B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 21030005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Influence of bias on visuospatial and verbal compatibility effects in mixed-mapping environments.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2594-605. PubMed ID: 21887599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Perceptual and motor congruency effects in time-space association.
    Fabbri M; Cellini N; Martoni M; Tonetti L; Natale V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1840-51. PubMed ID: 23904320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. East is not right: Spatial compatibility differs between egocentric and cardinal retrieval.
    Wang Q; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1250-1279. PubMed ID: 29966492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: The roles of stimulus type, response mode, and set-level compatibility.
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):825-36. PubMed ID: 25758176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Object location performance: detection of functional impairment in right temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Frisch C; Helmstaedter C
    Epilepsy Behav; 2014 Jun; 35():28-33. PubMed ID: 24792097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.
    Dittrich K; Dolk T; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC; Prinz W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1725-36. PubMed ID: 23896690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Automatic object identification: an fMRI study.
    Boucart M; Meyer ME; Pins D; Humphreys GW; Scheiber C; Gounod D; Foucher J
    Neuroreport; 2000 Aug; 11(11):2379-83. PubMed ID: 10943689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Naïve and experienced judgments of stimulus-response compatibility: implications for interface design.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jan; 46(1-3):169-87. PubMed ID: 12554405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Influence of preparatory schema on the speed of responses to spatially compatible and incompatible stimuli.
    Jennings JR; van der Molen MW; Van der Veen FM; Debski KB
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Jul; 39(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 12212642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Association between a color and a manual response activation modulates the response planning of typically developing children in a subsequent Simon task.
    Coutté A; Costini O; Ferrier LP; Reymondet E; Faure S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2181-8. PubMed ID: 26269387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. ABC versus QWERTZ: interference from mismatching sequences of letters in the alphabet and on the keyboard.
    Kozlik J; Neumann R; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1085-99. PubMed ID: 23244042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.