These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8165921)

  • 81. The influence of stimulus proximity on judgments of spatial relationships in patients with chronic unilateral right or left hemisphere stroke.
    Williamson JB; Haque S; Burtis B; Harciarek M; Lamb D; Zilli E; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 25350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Task-defined associations are mode specific for selection of relevant dimension but mode independent for selection of location mapping.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):370-91. PubMed ID: 18609411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Modulation of event-related potentials in normal human subjects by visual divided attention to spatial and color factors.
    Omoto S; Kuroiwa Y; Li M; Doi H; Shimamura M; Koyano S; Segawa H; Suzuki Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Oct; 311(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 11578828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and coding of tactile motor events: influence of distance between stimulated and responding body parts, spatial complexity of the task and sex of subject.
    Aglioti S; Tomaiuolo F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 11011866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes.
    Müsseler J; Aschersleben G; Arning K; Proctor RW
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 19827702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Right-left prevalence with task-irrelevant spatial codes.
    Rubichi S; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2005 Jan; 69(3):167-78. PubMed ID: 15597182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Numbers are represented in egocentric space: effects of numerical cues and spatial reference frames on hand laterality judgements.
    Conson M; Mazzarella E; Trojano L
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Mar; 452(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 19383434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Manual asymmetries in bimanual reaching: the influence of spatial compatibility and visuospatial attention.
    Neely K; Binsted G; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 15629221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.
    Wühr P; Biebl R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 19304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. The mechanisms of space-time association: comparing motor and perceptual contributions in time reproduction.
    Fabbri M; Cellini N; Martoni M; Tonetti L; Natale V
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(7):1228-50. PubMed ID: 23631355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. How time modulates spatial responses.
    Vallesi A; McIntosh AR; Stuss DT
    Cortex; 2011 Feb; 47(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 19818438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Bright on the right feels right: SQUARC compatibility is hedonically marked.
    Löffler CS; Gerten J; Mamporia M; Müller J; Neu T; Rumpf J; Schiller M; Schneider Y; Wozniak M; Topolinski S
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Jun; 36(4):767-772. PubMed ID: 35294332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right.
    Wühr P; Seegelke C
    J Cogn; 2018 Feb; 1(1):17. PubMed ID: 31517191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Sequence learning in Parkinson's disease: the effect of spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Werheid K; Ziessler M; Nattkemper D; Yves von Cramon D
    Brain Cogn; 2003 Jul; 52(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 12821107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Spatial intention-response compatibility.
    Ansorge U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Mar; 109(3):285-99. PubMed ID: 11881904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Action consequences affect the space-time congruency effect on reaction time.
    Janczyk M; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102850. PubMed ID: 31238176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Spatial S-R compatibility effects in an intentional imitation task.
    Heyes C; Ray E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Aug; 11(4):703-8. PubMed ID: 15581121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Sources of Directional Spatial Biases in Hemi-Image Drawing.
    Garcia O; Faghihi N; Vaid J
    Perception; 2020 Feb; 49(2):169-185. PubMed ID: 31830429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Need for space: the key distance effect depends on spatial stimulus configurations.
    Jonas M; Eloka O; Stephan J; Franz VH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91432. PubMed ID: 24642888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. The impact of horizontal and vertical Luminance SNARC compatibility on affective judgments.
    Gusmão B; Löffler CS; Topolinski S
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Dec; 36(8):1522-1530. PubMed ID: 36263873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.