166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8166120)
1. Digitized slice interposition in forensic dental radiographic identification. An in vitro study.
Wood RE; Tai CC; Blenkinsop B; Johnston D
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1994 Mar; 15(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 8166120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A specimen positioning device for dental radiographic identification--image geometry considerations.
Goldstein M; Sweet DJ; Wood RE
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 9456540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dental biometrics: alignment and matching of dental radiographs.
Chen H; Jain AK
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Aug; 27(8):1319-26. PubMed ID: 16119269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital dental radiographic identification in the pediatric, mixed and permanent dentitions.
Wood RE; Kirk NJ; Sweet DJ
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):910-6. PubMed ID: 10486940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstruction of root morphology in skeletonized remains with postmortem dental loss.
Smith BC
J Forensic Sci; 1992 Jan; 37(1):176-84. PubMed ID: 1545198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
Hubar JS; Carr RF
J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification.
van der Meer DT; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Dove SB; Senn DR
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1499-503. PubMed ID: 20629904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative dental radiographic identification using flat panel CT.
Birngruber CG; Obert M; Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):e31-4. PubMed ID: 21592696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental radiographic identification utilising computerised digital slice interposition: a case report.
Tai CC; Blenkinsop BR; Wood RE
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1993 Jun; 11(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 9227060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 2.
Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 22717955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical and digital techniques for enhancing radiographic anatomy for identification of human remains.
Fitzpatrick JJ; Shook DR; Kaufman BL; Wu SJ; Kirschner RJ; MacMahon H; Levine LJ; Maples W; Charletta D
J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):947-59. PubMed ID: 8914285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forensic Odontology: Automatic Identification of Persons Comparing Antemortem and Postmortem Panoramic Radiographs Using Computer Vision.
Heinrich A; Güttler F; Wendt S; Schenkl S; Hubig M; Wagner R; Mall G; Teichgräber U
Rofo; 2018 Dec; 190(12):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29913524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1.
Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive dental identification using tooth anatomy and digital superimposition.
Johansen RJ; Michael Bowers C
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):534-6. PubMed ID: 23278438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance analysis of various techniques applied in human identification using dental X-rays.
Banumathi A; Vijayakumari B; Geetha A; Shanmugavadivu N; Raju S
J Med Syst; 2007 Jun; 31(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 17622024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs: influence of operator qualifications and cognitive bias.
Pinchi V; Norelli GA; Caputi F; Fassina G; Pradella F; Vincenti C
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 22770720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A quantitative analysis of subtraction images based on bite-wing radiographs for simulated victim identification in forensic dentistry.
Wenzel A; Andersen L
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9227082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
