These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8166120)

  • 1. Digitized slice interposition in forensic dental radiographic identification. An in vitro study.
    Wood RE; Tai CC; Blenkinsop B; Johnston D
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1994 Mar; 15(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 8166120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A specimen positioning device for dental radiographic identification--image geometry considerations.
    Goldstein M; Sweet DJ; Wood RE
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 9456540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental biometrics: alignment and matching of dental radiographs.
    Chen H; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Aug; 27(8):1319-26. PubMed ID: 16119269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital dental radiographic identification in the pediatric, mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Wood RE; Kirk NJ; Sweet DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):910-6. PubMed ID: 10486940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reconstruction of root morphology in skeletonized remains with postmortem dental loss.
    Smith BC
    J Forensic Sci; 1992 Jan; 37(1):176-84. PubMed ID: 1545198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
    Hubar JS; Carr RF
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification.
    van der Meer DT; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Dove SB; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1499-503. PubMed ID: 20629904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative dental radiographic identification using flat panel CT.
    Birngruber CG; Obert M; Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):e31-4. PubMed ID: 21592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental radiographic identification utilising computerised digital slice interposition: a case report.
    Tai CC; Blenkinsop BR; Wood RE
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1993 Jun; 11(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 9227060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 2.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 22717955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical and digital techniques for enhancing radiographic anatomy for identification of human remains.
    Fitzpatrick JJ; Shook DR; Kaufman BL; Wu SJ; Kirschner RJ; MacMahon H; Levine LJ; Maples W; Charletta D
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):947-59. PubMed ID: 8914285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic Odontology: Automatic Identification of Persons Comparing Antemortem and Postmortem Panoramic Radiographs Using Computer Vision.
    Heinrich A; Güttler F; Wendt S; Schenkl S; Hubig M; Wagner R; Mall G; Teichgräber U
    Rofo; 2018 Dec; 190(12):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29913524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains.
    Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 11908607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
    Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
    Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive dental identification using tooth anatomy and digital superimposition.
    Johansen RJ; Michael Bowers C
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):534-6. PubMed ID: 23278438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance analysis of various techniques applied in human identification using dental X-rays.
    Banumathi A; Vijayakumari B; Geetha A; Shanmugavadivu N; Raju S
    J Med Syst; 2007 Jun; 31(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 17622024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs: influence of operator qualifications and cognitive bias.
    Pinchi V; Norelli GA; Caputi F; Fassina G; Pradella F; Vincenti C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 22770720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantitative analysis of subtraction images based on bite-wing radiographs for simulated victim identification in forensic dentistry.
    Wenzel A; Andersen L
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9227082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.