These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8166120)

  • 41. Self-assessment of the forensic value of dental records.
    Delattre VF; Stimson PG
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):906-9. PubMed ID: 10486939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of a personal identification method using the fusion function of CT images and dental radiographs.
    Sakuma A; Makino Y; Saitoh H; Chiba F; Ishii N; Iwase H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140137. PubMed ID: 25270062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Associated postmortem dental findings as an aid to personal identification.
    Pretty IA; Addy LD
    Sci Justice; 2002; 42(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 12407975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarity.
    Flint DJ; Brent Dove S; Brumit PC; White M; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 19040666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dental hygiene students' matching accuracy when comparing antemortem dental radiographs and oral photographs to simulated postmortem WinID3
    Bradshaw BT; Hunt AW; Ludwig E; Newcomb TL
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):154-162. PubMed ID: 36380500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Detection of Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials for Forensic Purposes Based on Their Optical Properties: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
    Kiran R; Chapman J; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):254-259. PubMed ID: 29989157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Usefulness of postmortem dental panoramic X-ray photographs taken using a portable radiography apparatus for dental identification].
    Yamaguchi T; Yamada Y; Yamamoto I; Ohira H; Watanabe A; Ohtani S
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 2002 Sep; 56(2-3):254-7. PubMed ID: 12415833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Postmortem dental radiography.
    Mincer HH; Chaudhry J; Blankenship JA; Turner EW
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Mar; 53(2):405-7. PubMed ID: 18284529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Furcation involvement: comparison of dental radiographs and HR-CT-slices in human specimens.
    Fuhrmann RA; Bücker A; Diedrich PR
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Jul; 32(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 9266492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The discrimination potential of radio-opaque composite restorations for identification: part 3.
    Zondag H; Phillips VM
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 22717956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Validation of dental radiographs for human identification.
    MacLean DF; Kogon SL; Stitt LW
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Sep; 39(5):1195-200. PubMed ID: 7964563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of dental radiographic identification: an experimental study.
    Sholl SA; Moody GH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Jan; 115(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 11074171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Craniofacial identification by computer-mediated superimposition.
    Al-Amad S; McCullough M; Graham J; Clement J; Hill A
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Dec; 24(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 17175836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dental misidentification on the basis of presumed unique features.
    Kieser JA; Firth NA; Buckley H
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2001 Dec; 19(2):36-9. PubMed ID: 11813499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe Photoshop.
    Bollinger SA; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 19187451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Guidelines for reproducing geometrical aspects of intra-oral radiographs images on cone-beam computed tomography.
    Curi JP; Beaini TL; Silva RHAD; Melani RFH; Chilvarquer I; Crosato EM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():68-74. PubMed ID: 28068573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Personal identification on the basis of antemortem and postmortem radiographs.
    Angyal M; Dérczy K
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1089-93. PubMed ID: 9729833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Endodontic imaging as an aid to forensic personal identification.
    Forrest AS; Wu HY
    Aust Endod J; 2010 Aug; 36(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 20666756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Triangular geometry-based novel feature and a novel algorithm for human identification using dental radiographs.
    Raju J; Modi CK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2013 Jul; 37(5):317-26. PubMed ID: 23773149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.