138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8166781)
1. Supportive nurse-midwife care is associated with a reduced incidence of cesarean section.
Butler J; Abrams B; Parker J; Roberts JM; Laros RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 168(5):1407-13. PubMed ID: 8166781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.
Davis LG; Riedmann GL; Sapiro M; Minogue JP; Kazer RR
J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8027851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.
Carlson NS; Corwin EJ; Hernandez TL; Holt E; Lowe NK; Hurt KJ
Birth; 2018 Jun; 45(2):159-168. PubMed ID: 29388247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.
Attanasio L; Kozhimannil KB
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jan; 63(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 29144586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.
Nijagal MA; Kuppermann M; Nakagawa S; Cheng Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 212(4):491.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25446697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preventing Cesarean Birth in Women with Obesity: Influence of Unit-Level Midwifery Presence on Use of Cesarean among Women in the Consortium on Safe Labor Data Set.
Carlson NS; Breman R; Neal JL; Phillippi JC
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 65(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 31464045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk population.
Kaiser PS; Kirby RS
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jan; 97(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11152904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Singleton, Term, Vertex Cesarean Delivery on a Midwife Service Compared With an Obstetrician Service.
Damiano EA; Auty SG; Von Mertens J; Gerjevic KA
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 135(6):1353-1361. PubMed ID: 32459427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neonatal outcomes in fetuses with cardiac anomalies and the impact of delivery route.
Parikh LI; Grantz KL; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Landy HJ; Fries MH; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):469.e1-469.e12. PubMed ID: 28578168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.
Yee LM; Liu LY; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):75.e1-75.e6. PubMed ID: 27589899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.
MacDorman MF; Singh GK
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 May; 52(5):310-7. PubMed ID: 9764282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maternal body mass index, delivery route, and induction of labor in a midwifery caseload.
Graves BW; DeJoy SA; Heath A; Pekow P
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2006; 51(4):254-259. PubMed ID: 16814219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of institutional differences in primary cesarean birth rates.
Baruffi G; Strobino DM; Paine LL
J Nurse Midwifery; 1990; 35(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 2258756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.
Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Brent RL; Arabin B; Levene MI; Chervenak FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25446661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of early postpartum mental distress in mothers with midwifery home care--results from a nested case-control study.
Staehelin K; Kurth E; Schindler C; Schmid M; Zemp Stutz E
Swiss Med Wkly; 2013; 143():w13862. PubMed ID: 23986402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Epidural Analgesia Alone and in Association With Other Variables on the Risk of Cesarean Section.
Herrera-Gómez A; Luna-Bertos E; Ramos-Torrecillas J; Ocaña-Peinado FM; García-Martínez O; Ruiz C
Biol Res Nurs; 2017 Jul; 19(4):393-398. PubMed ID: 28436235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in cesarean delivery for fetal distress.
Hueston WJ; McClaflin RR; Claire E
J Fam Pract; 1996 Nov; 43(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 8917145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor on frequency of emergency cesarean delivery among nulliparous Chinese women.
Wang F; Cao YX; Ke SG; Zhu TH; Zhang M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Dec; 135(3):259-263. PubMed ID: 27692473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
