BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8168029)

  • 1. Ethical dilemmas in the critically ill elderly.
    Clarke DE; Goldstein MK; Raffin TA
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1994 Feb; 10(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 8168029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical issues in emergency care.
    Arras J
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1993 Aug; 9(3):655-64. PubMed ID: 8374863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decisions for and against resuscitation in an acute geriatric medicine unit serving the frail elderly.
    Torian LV; Davidson EJ; Fillit HM; Fulop G; Sell LL
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Mar; 152(3):561-5. PubMed ID: 1510746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical considerations and CPR in the elderly patient.
    Carton RW; Brown MD
    Clin Chest Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):591-9. PubMed ID: 8222572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Living wills and resuscitation preferences in an elderly population.
    Walker RM; Schonwetter RS; Kramer DR; Robinson BE
    Arch Intern Med; 1995 Jan; 155(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 7811126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Not for all terminally ill patients.
    Ginn D; Zitner D
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Apr; 41():649-52, 655-7. PubMed ID: 7787495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical care research on patients with advance directives or do-not-resuscitate status: ethical challenges for clinician-investigators.
    Williams MA; Haywood C
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S167-71. PubMed ID: 12626963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes toward advance directives and the impact of prognostic information on the preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in medical inpatients in Chiang Mai University Hospital, Thailand.
    Sittisombut S; Love EJ; Sitthi-Amorn C
    Nurs Health Sci; 2005 Dec; 7(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 16271130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
    White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advance care planning preferences among dialysis patients and factors influencing their decisions.
    Al-Jahdali HH; Bahroon S; Babgi Y; Tamim H; Al-Ghamdi SM; Al-Sayyari AA
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2009 Mar; 20(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 19237810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing physicians in recommending in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Miller DL; Gorbien MJ; Simbartl LA; Jahnigen DW
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Sep; 153(17):1999-2003. PubMed ID: 8357284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision making for the critically ill neonate near the end of life.
    Cook LA; Watchko JF
    J Perinatol; 1996; 16(2 Pt 1):133-6. PubMed ID: 8732563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How misconceptions among elderly patients regarding survival outcomes of inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation affect do-not-resuscitate orders.
    Adams DH; Snedden DP
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Jul; 106(7):402-4. PubMed ID: 16912338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcome and cost implications of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the medical intensive care unit of a comprehensive cancer center.
    Wallace S; Ewer MS; Price KJ; Feeley TW
    Support Care Cancer; 2002 Jul; 10(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 12136227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: can surrogates accurately predict patients' preferences?
    Marks MA; Arkes HR
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 18566485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensify, resuscitate or palliate: decision making in the critically ill patient with haematological malignancy.
    Hill QA
    Blood Rev; 2010 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19913962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Older people's reasoning for resuscitation preferences and their role in the decision-making process.
    Laakkonen ML; Pitkala KH; Strandberg TE; Berglind S; Tilvis RS
    Resuscitation; 2005 May; 65(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 15866396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Ethics in preclinical emergency medicine--on the topic of medical futility and resuscitation efforts].
    Mohr M; Kettler D
    Anaesthesiol Reanim; 1998; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 9553247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.