BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8168316)

  • 1. Effect of sterilization and storage treatments on screw pullout strength in human allograft bone.
    Simonian PT; Conrad EU; Chapman JR; Harrington RM; Chansky HA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 May; (302):290-6. PubMed ID: 8168316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical properties of canine cortical bone allografts: effects of preparation and storage.
    Roe SC; Pijanowski GJ; Johnson AL
    Am J Vet Res; 1988 Jun; 49(6):873-7. PubMed ID: 3041883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of screw torque level on cortical bone pullout strength.
    Cleek TM; Reynolds KJ; Hearn TC
    J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Feb; 21(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 17304067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical analysis of allograft bone treated with a novel tissue sterilization process.
    Mroz TE; Lin EL; Summit MC; Bianchi JR; Keesling JE; Roberts M; Vangsness CT; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16413445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction of pullout strength caused by reinsertion of 3.5-mm cortical screws.
    Matityahu A; Hurschler C; Badenhop M; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Waizy H; Wentz B; Marmor M; Krettek C
    J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Mar; 27(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 22534691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of screw pullout rate on screw purchase in synthetic cancellous bone.
    Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):024501. PubMed ID: 19102576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [In vitro study of the role of various preservation methods on mechanical properties of allografts of the patellar tendon].
    Kerboull L; Christel P; Meunier A
    Chirurgie; 1991; 117(9):751-62. PubMed ID: 1843677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical properties of radiation-sterilised human Bone-Tendon-Bone grafts preserved by different methods.
    Kamiński A; Gut G; Marowska J; Lada-Kozłowska M; Biwejnis W; Zasacka M
    Cell Tissue Bank; 2009 Aug; 10(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 18982427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of processing techniques on the mechanical properties of bone-anterior cruciate ligament-bone allografts. An experimental study in goats.
    Jackson DW; Grood ES; Wilcox P; Butler DL; Simon TM; Holden JP
    Am J Sports Med; 1988; 16(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 3377093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical strength of cortical allografts with gamma radiation versus ethylene oxide sterilization.
    Zhou Z; Qin T; Yang J; Shen B; Kang P; Peil F
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Oct; 77(5):670-5. PubMed ID: 22187845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro study of the structural properties of deep-frozen versus freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized canine anterior cruciate ligament bone-ligament-bone preparations.
    Turner WD; Vasseur P; Gorek JE; Rodrigo JJ; Wedell JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 May; (230):251-6. PubMed ID: 3365899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical properties of bone allografts.
    Pelker RR; Friedlaender GE; Markham TC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Apr; (174):54-7. PubMed ID: 6339142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength.
    Wittenberg RH; Lee KS; Shea M; White AA; Hayes WC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Nov; (296):278-87. PubMed ID: 8222439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
    Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws used as a salvage procedure.
    Yüksel KZ; Adams MS; Chamberlain RH; Potocnjak M; Park SC; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 17482111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.