BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8168442)

  • 1. Sound evaluation of partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: comparative study of frequency responses.
    Kodera K; Suzuki J; Nagai K; Yabe T
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 8168442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term clinical results of the partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant.
    Suzuki J; Kodera K; Nagai K; Yabe T
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8168441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Present status and outlook of the implantable hearing aid.
    Gyo K; Yanagihara N; Saiki T; Hinohira Y
    Am J Otol; 1990 Jul; 11(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 2399943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partially implantable hearing aid using piezoelectric ceramic ossicular vibrator. Results of the implant operation and assessment of the hearing afforded by the device.
    Yanagihara N; Gyo K; Hinohira Y
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 7739871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Response property of tone burst transmission of partially implantable middle ear implant in vivo].
    Zhao S; Xia Y; Guo J; Shen J
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Jun; 36(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 12761922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The bone-anchored hearing aid: principal design and audiometric results.
    Håkansson BE; Carlsson PU; Tjellström A; Lidén G
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Sep; 73(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7988397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Audiological evaluation of the middle ear implant--speech discrimination under noise circumstances].
    Saiki T; Gyo K; Yanagihara N
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Apr; 93(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 2376792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fully implantable hearing aids in patients with congenital auricular atresia.
    Siegert R; Mattheis S; Kasic J
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Feb; 117(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 17277630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear hearing device. Long-term results.
    Suzuki J; Kodera K; Nagai K; Yabe T
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 7739872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system.
    Roland PS; Shoup AG; Shea MC; Richey HS; Jones DB
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Oct; 111(10):1682-6. PubMed ID: 11801925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early clinical results: SOUNDTEC implantable hearing device phase II study.
    Hough JV; Dyer RK; Matthews P; Wood MW
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and fidelity of a novel piezoelectric middle ear transducer.
    Chi FL; Wu Y; Yan QB; Shen YH; Jiang Y; Fan BH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 19707040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech evaluation of partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear implants in vivo.
    Shen JX; Xia YF; Xu ZM; Zhao SQ; Guo JZ
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 10981603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further clinical experiences with middle-ear implantable hearing aids: indications and sound quality evaluation.
    Suzuki J; Kodera K; Suzuki M; Ashikawa H
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1989; 51(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 2748142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current status and future of implantable electromagnetic hearing aids.
    Goode RL
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 7739860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rehabilitation of high-frequency hearing loss with the RetroX auditory implant.
    Garin P; Genard F; Galle C; Fameree MH; Jamart J; Gersdorff M
    B-ENT; 2005; 1(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15999671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Correlation of speech audiometry with the Fowler and Sabin method of hearing loss evaluation].
    Novotný Z; Novák M
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Jun; 39(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 2397519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implantation of electromagnetic ossicular replacement device.
    Tos M; Salomon G; Bonding P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):92-6, 98-100, 102-3. PubMed ID: 8168451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.