These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8169296)

  • 1. Effect of sampling status and adjustment for heterogeneous variance on bias in bull evaluations.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Mar; 77(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 8169296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influences of progeny test programs on genetic evaluations of young sires.
    Vierhout CN; Cassell BG; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Sep; 81(9):2524-32. PubMed ID: 9785245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Merit of outliers for milk yield as indicators of accuracy of genetic evaluations of sires.
    Meinert TR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2951-5. PubMed ID: 9839239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timeliness and effectiveness of progeny testing through artificial insemination.
    Norman HD; Powell RL; Wright JR; Sattler CG
    J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr; 86(4):1513-25. PubMed ID: 12741578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of predicting genetic merit from pedigree information for bulls entering stud sampling programs.
    Samuelson DJ; Pearson RE
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Sep; 78(9):2057-66. PubMed ID: 8550915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stability of genetic evaluations for active artificial insemination bulls.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2614-20. PubMed ID: 15328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3444-7. PubMed ID: 22612979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of most recent evaluations of Holstein bulls from first available pedigree information.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 11949873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of foreign dairy bull evaluations in predicting United States evaluations for yield.
    Powell RL; Sanders AH; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2621-6. PubMed ID: 15328287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variances of and correlations among progeny tests for reproductive traits of cows sired by AI bulls.
    Clay JS; McDaniel BT; Brown CH
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jul; 87(7):2307-13. PubMed ID: 15328246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of bulls for progeny testing using pedigree indices and characteristics of potential bull-dams' herds.
    Mao IL; Dong MC; Meadows CE
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Aug; 74(8):2747-56. PubMed ID: 1918548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heritability of changes in genetic evaluations of dairy bulls from first to later records of daughters.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Apr; 85(4):951-7. PubMed ID: 12018441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal size of progeny groups for progeny-testing programs by artificial insemination firms.
    Dekkers JC; Vandervoort GE; Burnside EB
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Nov; 79(11):2056-70. PubMed ID: 8961113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships of productive life evaluations with changes in evaluations for yields.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT; Tabbaa MJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):677-81. PubMed ID: 11949874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Derivation and calculation of approximate reliabilities and daughter yield-deviations of a random regression test-day model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle.
    Liu Z; Reinhardt F; Bünger A; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jun; 87(6):1896-907. PubMed ID: 15453507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of correction for heterogeneity of variance on bias and accuracy of breeding value estimation for Dutch dairy cattle.
    van der Werf JH; Meuwissen TH; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3174-84. PubMed ID: 7836606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proven and young Holstein bulls compared for daughter yields, productive life, somatic cell score, and inbreeding.
    Abdallah JM; McDaniel BT
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Mar; 85(3):665-9. PubMed ID: 11949872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method for combining United States and Canadian bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM; Powell RL
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2834-9. PubMed ID: 1430487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.