These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8169760)

  • 1. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment.
    Chaiken S; Maheswaran D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Mar; 66(3):460-73. PubMed ID: 8169760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment.
    Maheswaran D; Chaiken S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Jul; 61(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 1890583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When expertise backfires: contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion.
    Bohner G; Ruder M; Erb HP
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 41(Pt 4):495-519. PubMed ID: 12593750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Sawicki V; Petty RE; Briñol P
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1571-84. PubMed ID: 23969619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readers' reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension.
    Sparks JR; Rapp DN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):230-47. PubMed ID: 21244116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing.
    Tiedens LZ; Linton S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Dec; 81(6):973-88. PubMed ID: 11761319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: the effects of source credibility in multiple message situations.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 17363764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence.
    Mackie DM; Asuncion AG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1990 Jul; 59(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 2213488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion.
    Darke PR; Chaiken S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 89(6):864-83. PubMed ID: 16393021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific Message Translation and the Heuristic Systematic Model: Insights for Designing Educational Messages About Progesterone and Breast Cancer Risks.
    Hitt R; Perrault E; Smith S; Keating DM; Nazione S; Silk K; Russell J
    J Cancer Educ; 2016 Jun; 31(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 25903053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages: the effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing.
    Martin R; Hewstone M; Martin PY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17178929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heuristic-systematic information processing and risk judgment.
    Trumbo CW
    Risk Anal; 1999 Jun; 19(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 10765412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of persuasive in-group messages.
    Mackie DM; Worth LT; Asuncion AG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1990 May; 58(5):812-22. PubMed ID: 2348369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conflict and bias in heuristic judgment.
    Bhatia S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):319-325. PubMed ID: 27685023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of Source Credibility in the Presence or Absence of Prior Attitudes: Implications for the Design of Persuasive Communication Campaigns.
    Kumkale GT; Albarracín D; Seignourel PJ
    J Appl Soc Psychol; 2010 Jun; 40(6):1325-1356. PubMed ID: 21625405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information processing under high and low distractions using eye tracking.
    Wu D; Huang H; Liu N; Miao D
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 30051237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of argument quality, source credibility and self-reported diabetes knowledge on message attitudes: an experiment using diabetes related messages.
    Lin TC; Hwang LL; Lai YJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2017 Sep; 34(3):225-235. PubMed ID: 28513005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information processing of genetically modified food messages under different motives: an adaptation of the multiple-motive heuristic-systematic model.
    Kim J; Paek HJ
    Risk Anal; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1793-806. PubMed ID: 19948001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitude confidence and source credibility in information foraging with social tags.
    Schweiger S; Cress U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210423. PubMed ID: 30645619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.