These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8169910)

  • 1. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tongsong T; Piyamongkol W
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 8169910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.
    Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The duration of the outpatient nonstress test (NST) and the diagnosis of fetal reactivity with noncomputerized cardiotocography, A critical review of 1160 tracings].
    Cito G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997; 49(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 9162883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The role of vibroacoustic stimulation in antenatal fetal assessment].
    Leis Marquez MT; Hernández Andrade E; Maya Goldsmit D; Pérez de la Huerta MI; López García RB
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1993 Dec; 61():356-9. PubMed ID: 8119607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The predictive value of fetal acoustic stimulation.
    Saraçoğlu F; Göl K; Sahin I; Türkkani B; Oztopçu C
    J Perinatol; 1999 Mar; 19(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 10642968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical evaluation of antepartum vibratory acoustic stimulation test].
    Chen BJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Mar; 26(2):71-4, 123. PubMed ID: 1860368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of halogen light in fetal stimulation for fetal well-being assessment.
    Thanaboonyawat I; Wataganara T; Boriboonhiransarn D; Viboonchart S; Tontisirin P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1376-80. PubMed ID: 17100372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors that increase reactivity during fetal nonstress testing.
    Esin S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24614020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diagnostic evaluation of fetal distress during pregnancy by a sound stimulation test].
    Querleu D; Boutteville C; Renard X; Crépin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1984; 13(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 6526980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive value of the nonreactive nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome.
    Bhide A; Bhattacharya MS
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Apr; 36(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 2097363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Platt LD; Broussard P; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 3524234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.