These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8170132)

  • 1. Effects of synthetic voice output on attitudes toward the augmented communicator.
    Gorenflo CW; Gorenflo DW; Santer SA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Feb; 37(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 8170132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals.
    Gorenflo CW; Gorenflo DW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 34(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 1826139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is awesome really awesome? How the inclusion of informal terms on an AAC device influences children's attitudes toward peers who use AAC.
    Beck AR; Bock S; Thompson JR; Bowman L; Robbins S
    Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(1):56-69. PubMed ID: 15936922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The persuasiveness of synthetic speech versus human speech.
    Stern SE; Mullennix JW; Dyson C; Wilson SJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):588-95. PubMed ID: 10774129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthetic and natural speech preferences of male and female listeners in four age groups.
    Mirenda P; Eicher D; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 2523007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listeners' attitude toward people with dysphonia.
    Amir O; Levine-Yundof R
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e1-10. PubMed ID: 23490129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of speakers' augmented characteristics and listeners' sex on intelligibility and acceptability of synthesized speech.
    Ellis LW; Spiegel B; Benjamin B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1081-8. PubMed ID: 12186228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of the design of voice output communication aids.
    Judge S; Townend G
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(4):366-81. PubMed ID: 23889833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development and utilization of a scale to measure adolescents' attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices.
    Beck AR; Thompson JR; Kosuwan K; Prochnow JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):572-87. PubMed ID: 20008679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DECtalk and VeriVox: intelligibility, likeability, and rate preference differences for four listener groups.
    Von Berg S; Panorska A; Uken D; Qeadan F
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Mar; 25(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 19280420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes of children towards augmentative and alternative communication systems.
    Lilienfeld M; Alant E
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2001; 48():45-54. PubMed ID: 14968695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative communication system user.
    Bedrosian JL; Hoag LA; Calculator SN; Molineux B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1105-13. PubMed ID: 1447921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech across three augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) output methods.
    Higginbotham DJ; Scally CA; Lundy DC; Kowarsky K
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):889-901. PubMed ID: 7474981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Living through a computer voice: a personal account.
    Martin A; Newell C
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Oct; 38(3):96-104. PubMed ID: 23841537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DECTalk and MacinTalk speech synthesizers: intelligibility differences for three listener groups.
    Hustad KC; Kent RD; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Aug; 41(4):744-52. PubMed ID: 9712123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Segmental intelligibility and speech interference thresholds of high-quality synthetic speech in presence of noise.
    Koul RK; Allen GD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Aug; 36(4):790-8. PubMed ID: 8377491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of information on listeners' attitudes toward speakers with voice or resonance disorders.
    Lallh AK; Rochet AP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):782-95. PubMed ID: 10877445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthetic speech comprehension: a comparison of children with normal and impaired language skills.
    Reynolds ME; Fucci D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 41(2):458-66. PubMed ID: 9570596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of speech output type, message length, and reauditorization on perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult AAC user.
    Hoag LA; Bedrosian JL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1363-6. PubMed ID: 1494278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.