These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8170368)

  • 1. Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees.
    Tajima F; Takezaki N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 8170368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of protein distance measures and tree-building methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Hollich V; Milchert L; Arvestad L; Sonnhammer EL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2257-64. PubMed ID: 16049194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making?
    Rzhetsky A; Sitnikova T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):1255-65. PubMed ID: 8896378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
    McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic distances and phylogenetic trees of different Awassi sheep populations based on DNA sequencing.
    Al-Atiyat RM; Aljumaah RS
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Aug; 13(3):6557-68. PubMed ID: 25177936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions.
    Fukami-Kobayashi K; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 1849180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New weighting methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction using multiple loci.
    Misawa K; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 2012 Aug; 75(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 22871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA.
    Takezaki N; Nei M
    Genetics; 1996 Sep; 144(1):389-99. PubMed ID: 8878702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Family-Joining: A Fast Distance-Based Method for Constructing Generally Labeled Trees.
    Kalaghatgi P; Pfeifer N; Lengauer T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Oct; 33(10):2720-34. PubMed ID: 27436007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
    Antezana M
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient biased estimation of evolutionary distances when substitution rates vary across sites.
    Guindon S; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 11919295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.