These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8170368)

  • 21. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions.
    Liu L; Pearl DK
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):504-14. PubMed ID: 17562474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Importance of synonymous substitutions under dense taxon sampling and appropriate modeling in reconstructing the mitogenomic tree of Eutheria.
    Wu J; Hasegawa M; Zhong Y; Yonezawa T
    Genes Genet Syst; 2014; 89(5):237-51. PubMed ID: 25832750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
    Saitou N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Jul; 4(4):406-25. PubMed ID: 3447015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The identifiability of tree topology for phylogenetic models, including covarion and mixture models.
    Allman ES; Rhodes JA
    J Comput Biol; 2006 Jun; 13(5):1101-13. PubMed ID: 16796553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.
    Soria-Carrasco V; Talavera G; Igea J; Castresana J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2954-6. PubMed ID: 17890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improvement of distance-based phylogenetic methods by a local maximum likelihood approach using triplets.
    Ranwez V; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Nov; 19(11):1952-63. PubMed ID: 12411604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robust Estimation of Evolutionary Distances with Information Theory.
    Cao MD; Allison L; Dix TI; Bodén M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 May; 33(5):1349-57. PubMed ID: 26912811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On Sackin's original proposal: the variance of the leaves' depths as a phylogenetic balance index.
    M Coronado T; Mir A; Rosselló F; Rotger L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):154. PubMed ID: 32326884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci.
    Shriver MD; Jin L; Boerwinkle E; Deka R; Ferrell RE; Chakraborty R
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 7476137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An efficient algorithm for approximating geodesic distances in tree space.
    Battagliero S; Puglia G; Vicario S; Rubino F; Scioscia G; Leo P
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(5):1196-207. PubMed ID: 21116041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tests of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data.
    Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jan; 12(1):131-51. PubMed ID: 7877488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of evolutionary parameters with phylogenetic trees.
    Wang Q; Salter LA; Pearl DK
    J Mol Evol; 2002 Dec; 55(6):684-95. PubMed ID: 12486527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Matching split distance for unrooted binary phylogenetic trees.
    Bogdanowicz D; Giaro K
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(1):150-60. PubMed ID: 21383415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of two methods for constructing evolutionary distances from a weighted contribution of transition and transversion differences.
    Pollock DD; Goldstein DB
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jul; 12(4):713-7. PubMed ID: 7659024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Heterogeneity of nucleotide frequencies among evolutionary lineages and phylogenetic inference.
    Rosenberg MS; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Apr; 20(4):610-21. PubMed ID: 12679548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.