56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8170791)
1. Interpolation of forms in random-dot stereograms with varying dot densities.
Kobayashi I
Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1361-2. PubMed ID: 8170791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience and latency to achieve stereopsis.
MacCracken PJ; Hayes WN
Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 Pt 2):1227-31. PubMed ID: 1012899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Form and depth in global stereopsis.
Chung CS; Berbaum K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 6232344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
Pressmar SB; Haase W
Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The discriminability of smooth stereoscopic surfaces.
Norman JF; Lappin JS; Zucker SW
Perception; 1991; 20(6):789-807. PubMed ID: 1816536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random-dot stereograms of real objects: observation on stereo faces and moulds.
Georgeson MA
Perception; 1979; 8(5):585-8. PubMed ID: 503788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
Palmisano S; Allison RS; Howard IP
Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Children perceive large-disparity random-dot stereograms more readily than adults.
Dowd JM; Clifton RK; Anderson DR; Eichelman WH
J Exp Child Psychol; 1980 Feb; 29(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7354258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deficits in stereoscopic depth perception by mildly mentally retarded adults.
Fox R; Oross S
Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):232-44. PubMed ID: 3228516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cerebral asymmetries in random-dot stereopsis: reversal of direction with changes in dot size.
Pitblado CB
Perception; 1979; 8(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 530809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shape from stereo: a systematic approach using quadratic surfaces.
de Vries SC; Kappers AM; Koenderink JJ
Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 8433907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mixed-polarity random-dot stereograms alter GABA and Glx concentration in the early visual cortex.
Rideaux R; Goncalves NR; Welchman AE
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):888-896. PubMed ID: 31291136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A nonspecific learning effect in the perception of random-dot stereograms?
Weinman J; Cooke V
Perception; 1982; 11(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 7133939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The development of depth perception from motion parallax in infancy.
Nawrot E; Mayo SL; Nawrot M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 19304609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A freehand method for drawing stereoscopic pictures.
Schulman PH
Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):215-8. PubMed ID: 1945693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast summation effects and stereopsis.
Mayhew JE; Frisby JP
Perception; 1978; 7(5):537-50. PubMed ID: 733444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis.
Gillam B; Chambers D; Russo T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 2967874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereopsis measured by random-dot patterns--a new clinical test.
Wood IC; Tomlinson A
Br J Physiol Opt; 1976; 31(4):22-5. PubMed ID: 1053020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpolation in structure from motion.
Saidpour A; Braunstein ML; Hoffman DD
Percept Psychophys; 1992 Feb; 51(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 1549429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
