These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

36 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8171244)

  • 21. Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
    Lunsford LD; Flickinger JC; Larson D
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10388030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surfacing Filipino student nurses' perspectives of comfort and comforting viewed through metaphorical lens.
    de Guzman AB; Perlas CA; Palacios AM; Peralta MR
    Nurse Educ Today; 2007 May; 27(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 16831496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Increased absenteeism from work among aware and treated hypertensive and hypercholesterolaemic patients.
    Leynen F; De Backer G; Pelfrene E; Clays E; Kittel F; Moreau M; Kornitzer M
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2006 Apr; 13(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 16575282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [General practitioners' perception of disease risks and benefit of prevention].
    Nexøe J; Gyrd-Hansen D; Kragstrup J; Kristiansen IS; Nielsen JB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Nov; 164(46):5379-82. PubMed ID: 12469383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Critical discourse analysis for nursing research.
    Smith JL
    Nurs Inq; 2007 Mar; 14(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 17298609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Creating nursing knowledge in Brazil: research topics].
    do Prado ML; Gelbcke FL
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2001; 54(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 12222030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The analysis of the data for two-way contingency tables.
    Knapp TR
    Res Nurs Health; 1999 Jun; 22(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 10344706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The significance of power in research design (Part II).
    Kachoyeanos MK
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1998; 23(3):155. PubMed ID: 9595913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Absolute risk reduction, relative risk reduction, and number needed to treat.
    Ranganathan P; Pramesh CS; Aggarwal R
    Perspect Clin Res; 2016; 7(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 26952180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.
    Replogle WH; Johnson WD
    Fam Med; 2007 Jun; 39(6):432-5. PubMed ID: 17549653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measures of association in clinical trials: definition and interpretation.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1393-401. PubMed ID: 14768494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Do physicians interpret therapy outcome differently than students?].
    Damur C; Steurer J
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000 Feb; 130(6):171-6. PubMed ID: 10719717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Number needed to treat and number needed to harm are not the best way to report and assess the results of randomised clinical trials.
    Hutton JL
    Br J Haematol; 2009 Jun; 146(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 19438480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The trap of percentages].
    Bobbio M
    Riv Inferm; 1993; 12(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 8171244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 2.