These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8172292)

  • 1. Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential.
    Gantz BJ; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Am J Otol; 1994 Mar; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 8172292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Gantz BJ
    Am J Otol; 1998 May; 19(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 9596182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Borland J; Bertschy MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):453-67. PubMed ID: 8783126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EAP recordings in ineraid patients--correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting.
    Zimmerling MJ; Hochmair ES
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 11951852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant.
    Mason SM; Cope Y; Garnham J; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11694097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Fryauf-Bertschy H; Kelsay D; Gantz BJ
    Ear Hear; 1994 Apr; 15(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 8020649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia.
    Valero J; Blaser S; Papsin BC; James AL; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 21750462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploratory cochleotomy. Assessment of auditory nerve excitability and anatomical conditions in cochlear implant candidates.
    Montandon P; Kasper A; Pelizzone M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 1475098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoperative test of auditory nerve function.
    Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S93-4. PubMed ID: 9391614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
    Papsin BC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold.
    Caner G; Olgun L; Gültekin G; Balaban M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):637-40. PubMed ID: 17667772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extracochlear sixteen-channel electrode system.
    Banfai P; Karczag A; Kubik S; Lüers P; Sürth W
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):371-408. PubMed ID: 3754953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device.
    Franck KH; Norton SJ
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):289-99. PubMed ID: 11527036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results.
    Montandon PB; Boëx C; Pelizzone M
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 8572086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of parameter manipulations on spread of excitation measured with electrically-evoked compound action potentials.
    van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):465-74. PubMed ID: 22315988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.
    Hughes ML; Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Kelsay DM; Teagle HF; Lowder MW
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):471-86. PubMed ID: 11770670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential.
    Franck KH
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):67S-71S. PubMed ID: 11883769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in cochlear implantation of children with inner ear malformations.
    Kim AH; Kileny PR; Arts HA; El-Kashlan HK; Telian SA; Zwolan TA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):626-34. PubMed ID: 18520627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.