These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8172392)

  • 1. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of clinical orthodontic judgments based on intraoral and extraoral photographs.
    Lauweryns I; van Cauwenberghe N; Carels C
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8172392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imprecision in orthodontic diagnosis: reliability of clinical measures of malocclusion.
    Keeling SD; McGorray S; Wheeler TT; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 8893108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography.
    Piñero DP; Saenz González C; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 19101433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations.
    Quinn JV; Drzewiecki AE; Stiell IG; Elmslie TJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Mar; 13(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 7893315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17197331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of vertebral endplate signal (modic) changes in the lumbar spine: the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification.
    Jensen TS; Sorensen JS; Kjaer P
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):748-54. PubMed ID: 17729006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of pharmacological mydriasis on biomicroscopic evaluation of the glaucomatous optic nerve head.
    O'Brien PD; Bogdan AJ; Fitzpatrick P; Beatty S
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Nov; 19(11):1194-9. PubMed ID: 15543187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyelid position measurement in Graves' ophthalmopathy: reliability of a photographic technique and comparison with a clinical technique.
    Edwards DT; Bartley GB; Hodge DO; Gorman CA; Bradley EA
    Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1029-34. PubMed ID: 15121384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the calculation of the lipid-laden macrophage index: implications for its use in the evaluation of aspiration in children.
    Reid-Nicholson M; Kulkarni R; Adeagbo B; Looney S; Crosby J
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Dec; 38(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20049966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knowledge of chronology of optic disc stereophotographs influences the determination of glaucomatous change.
    Altangerel U; Bayer A; Henderer JD; Katz LJ; Steinmann WC; Spaeth GL
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Jan; 112(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15629818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of malocclusion in sleep-disordered breathing.
    Carvalho FR; Lentini-Oliveira DA; Carvalho GM; Singer JM; Prado LB; Prado GF; Carvalho LB
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2014 Feb; 72(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 24604364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can cephalometric indices and subjective evaluation be consistent for facial asymmetry?
    Masuoka N; Momoi Y; Ariji Y; Nawa H; Muramatsu A; Goto S; Ariji E
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 16097236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement, reproducibility, and accuracy of computed tomographic measurements of pituitary gland dimensions in healthy dogs.
    van der Vlugt-Meijer RH; Meij BP; Voorhout G
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Oct; 67(10):1750-5. PubMed ID: 17014327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.
    Cardash HS; Ormanier Z; Laufer BZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of therapist-assisted videotaped evaluations of upper-limb hemiplegia.
    Waters PM; Zurakowski D; Patterson P; Bae DS; Nimec D
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 29(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 15043910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in lower-limb deformity correction measurements.
    Feldman DS; Henderson ER; Levine HB; Schrank PL; Koval KJ; Patel RJ; Spencer DB; Sala DA; Egol KA
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Mar; 27(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 17314647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma.
    Reus NJ; de Graaf M; Lemij HG
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 91(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 17035283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need.
    Mok CW; Zhou L; McGrath C; Hägg U; Bendeus M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Nov; 65(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 18071959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis and treatment of SLAP tears using the Snyder classification.
    Gobezie R; Zurakowski D; Lavery K; Millett PJ; Cole BJ; Warner JJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jul; 36(7):1373-9. PubMed ID: 18354142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.