These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8172392)

  • 21. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Rome II criteria in children.
    Saps M; Di Lorenzo C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 100(9):2079-82. PubMed ID: 16128955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of additional video documentation to photo documentation in wrist arthroscopies on intra- and interobserver reliability.
    Löw S; Pillukat T; Prommersberger KJ; van Schoonhoven J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Mar; 133(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 23254378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validated assessment scales for the lower face.
    Narins RS; Carruthers J; Flynn TC; Geister TL; Görtelmeyer R; Hardas B; Himmrich S; Jones D; Kerscher M; de Maio M; Mohrmann C; Pooth R; Rzany B; Sattler G; Buchner L; Benter U; Breitscheidel L; Carruthers A
    Dermatol Surg; 2012 Feb; 38(2 Spec No.):333-42. PubMed ID: 22316189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How orthodontic records can influence torque choice decisions?
    Mavreas D; Kuppens E; Buyl R; Vande Vannet B
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 26409048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are photographic records reliable for orthodontic screening?
    Mandall NA
    J Orthod; 2002 Jun; 29(2):125-7. PubMed ID: 12114462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A protocol for structured observation of motor performance in preterm and term infants. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver consistency.
    Hammarlund K; Persson K; Sedin G; Strömberg B
    Ups J Med Sci; 1993; 98(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 8362467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of an implant-skin interface scoring system for external skeletal fixation of dogs.
    McDonald-Lynch MB; Marcellin-Little DJ; Roe SC; Lascelles BD; Trumpatori BJ; Griffith EH
    Am J Vet Res; 2015 Nov; 76(11):931-8. PubMed ID: 26512537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Toronto Facial Grading System: interobserver reliability.
    Kayhan FT; Zurakowski D; Rauch SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Feb; 122(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 10652392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating photographic scales of facial pores and diagnostic agreement of tests using latent class models.
    Ning Y; Qing Z; Qing W; Li L
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2017 Feb; 19(1):64-67. PubMed ID: 27775445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing and validating the Cutaneous WARTS (CWARTS) diagnostic tool: a novel clinical assessment and classification system for cutaneous warts.
    Hogendoorn GK; Bruggink SC; Hermans KE; Kouwenhoven STP; Quint KD; Wolterbeek R; Eekhof JAH; de Koning MNC; Rissmann R; Burggraaf J; Bouwes Bavinck JN
    Br J Dermatol; 2018 Feb; 178(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 28949011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Students' precision and interobserver reliability of performance assessment in team sports.
    Richard JF; Godbout P; Gréhaigne JF
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2000 Mar; 71(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 10763526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Back to basics: Percentage agreement measures are adequate, but there are easier ways.
    Birkimer JC; Brown JH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1979; 12(4):535-43. PubMed ID: 16795610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A probability-based formula for calculating interobserver agreement.
    Yelton AR; Wildman BG; Erickson MT
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1977; 10(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 16795541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A method for combining occurrence and nonoccurrence interobserver agreement scores.
    Harris FC; Lahey BB
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1978; 11(4):523-7. PubMed ID: 16795600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.
    Aksu M; Kaya D; Kocadereli I
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 20482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of clinical orthodontic judgments based on intraoral and extraoral photographs.
    Lauweryns I; van Cauwenberghe N; Carels C
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8172392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imprecision in orthodontic diagnosis: reliability of clinical measures of malocclusion.
    Keeling SD; McGorray S; Wheeler TT; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 8893108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography.
    Piñero DP; Saenz González C; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 19101433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.