These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8172525)

  • 1. Intrauterine pressure: comparison of extra vs intra amniotic methods using a transducer tipped catheter.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Steer PJ; Ratnam SS
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Mar; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 8172525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS; Steer PJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Mar; 99(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 1606114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artifactually elevated basal uterine tonus resulting from measurement of hydrostatic pressure by transducer-tipped intrauterine catheters.
    Ross MG; Walton J
    J Perinatol; 1994; 14(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 7830158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Determination of intrauterine pressure using catheter-tip transducer inserted outside fetal membranes].
    Yagami H; Kurauchi O; Furui T; Ohno Y; Ando H; Nomura S; Tanamura A; Mizutani S; Tomoda Y; Kasugai M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Dec; 45(12):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8270824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of intrauterine pressure measurements.
    Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Tien CY; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):800-2. PubMed ID: 1923200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of catheter-tip transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in the third stage of labour.
    Chua S; Lee M; Vanaja K; Chong YS; Nordstrom L; Arulkumaran S
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Mar; 105(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 9532999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.
    Dowdle MA
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):501-5. PubMed ID: 12953323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS
    J Perinat Med; 1995; 23(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 8904472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extramembranous placement of an air-coupled vs. transducer-tipped intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Sciscione AC; Duhl A; Pollock MA; Hoffman MK; Rhee A; Colmorgen GH
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Aug; 50(8):578-84. PubMed ID: 16220762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
    Chia YT; Arulkumaran S; Yang M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Jul; 42(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 8103477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between fibreoptic and catheter-tip bridge strain gauge transducers for measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Tham KF; Arulkumaran S; Chua S; Anandakumar C; Singh P; Ratnam SS
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Mar; 17(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 2064594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating a new intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Dowdle M
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Aug; 42(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 9284013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine-pressure studies in Thai nulliparous labour: the use of catheter-tip pressure transducer.
    Tannirandorn Y; Witoonpanich P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Aug; 76(8):436-40. PubMed ID: 7964245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of intrauterine pressure measurements with transcervical intra-amniotic catheters and an intra-amniotic miniature pressure transducer during labor.
    Neuman MR; Jordan JA; Roux JF; Knoke JD
    Gynecol Invest; 1972; 3(5):165-75. PubMed ID: 4656971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of uterine activity using the Term Guard monitor versus standard external tocodynamometry compared with the intrauterine pressure catheter.
    Hess LW; McCaul JF; Perry KG; Howard PR; Morrison JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 2359580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of catheter-tip pressure transducers for the measurement of intrauterine pressure in labour.
    Steer PJ; Carter MC; Gordon AJ; Beard RW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Aug; 85(8):561-6. PubMed ID: 687533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrauterine manometry: reapplication of an old concept.
    Strong TH; Ahn MO; Lipscomb KR; Masaki DI; Greenspoon JS; Paul RH
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1991 Apr; 34(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1674478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour.
    Jacod BC; Graatsma EM; Van Hagen E; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19672790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The prediction of "controlled" uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters.
    Devoe LD; Croom CS; Youssef AA; Murray C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 80(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 1407884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.