These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8172996)
1. Completeness and accuracy of interview data from proxy respondents: demographic, medical, and life-style factors. Nelson LM; Longstreth WT; Koepsell TD; Checkoway H; van Belle G Epidemiology; 1994 Mar; 5(2):204-17. PubMed ID: 8172996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misclassification of exposure in a case-control study: the effects of different types of exposure and different proxy respondents in a study of pancreatic cancer. Lyon JL; Egger MJ; Robison LM; French TK; Gao R Epidemiology; 1992 May; 3(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 1591321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of twins as mutual proxy respondents in a case-control study of breast cancer: effect of item nonresponse and misclassification. Hamilton AS; Mack TM Am J Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 152(11):1093-103. PubMed ID: 11117619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of proxy versus index respondent information in a population-based case-control study of rapidly fatal cancers. Campbell PT; Sloan M; Kreiger N Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 17178233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proxy respondents and the validity of occupational and other exposure data. The Selected Cancers Cooperative Study Group. Boyle CA; Brann EA Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Sep; 136(6):712-21. PubMed ID: 1442737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Data on prior pesticide use collected from self- and proxy respondents. Johnson RA; Mandel JS; Gibson RW; Mandel JH; Bender AP; Gunderson PD; Renier CM Epidemiology; 1993 Mar; 4(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 8452905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of information collected by proxy in family studies of Alzheimer's disease. Demissie S; Green RC; Mucci L; Tziavas S; Martelli K; Bang K; Coons L; Bourque S; Buchillon D; Johnson K; Smith T; Sharrow N; Lautenschlager N; Friedland R; Cupples LA; Farrer LA Neuroepidemiology; 2001 May; 20(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 11359077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of proxy-reported and self-reported household appliance use. Mills KM; Kheifets LI; Nelson LM; Bloch DA; Takemoto-Hambleton R; Kelsey JL Epidemiology; 2000 Sep; 11(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 10955412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An assessment of the usefulness of demographic data provided by surrogate respondents in a case-control study of Parkinson's disease. Wang F; Semchuk KM; Love EJ J Clin Epidemiol; 1992 Nov; 45(11):1219-27. PubMed ID: 1432002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the proxy effect and the saliency principle in household based postal questionnaires. Tennant A; Badley EM; Sullivan M J Epidemiol Community Health; 1991 Dec; 45(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 1839034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reliability of information from proxy respondents in health surveys]. Jardim R; Barreto SM; Giatti L Cad Saude Publica; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1537-48. PubMed ID: 21229213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wherein lies the truth? Assessment of agreement between parent proxy and child respondents. Whiteman D; Green A Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Aug; 26(4):855-9. PubMed ID: 9279619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement between proxy- and case-reported information obtained using the self- administered Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry epidemiologic questionnaire. Nadalin V; Cotterchio M; McKeown-Eyssen G; Gallinger S Chronic Dis Can; 2003; 24(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12757630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of surrogate information for controls in a case-control study on Alzheimer's disease. Villanueva V; Garcia AM J Alzheimers Dis; 2006 Dec; 10(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 17183153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of primary and proxy respondent reports of habitual physical activity, using kappa statistics and log-linear models. Graham P; Jackson R J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(4):255-65. PubMed ID: 11055276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing response reliability of health interview surveys using reinterviews. Fabricant SJ; Harpham T Bull World Health Organ; 1993; 71(3-4):341-8. PubMed ID: 8324853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Validity of occupational histories from proxy respondents]. Cordeiro R Rev Saude Publica; 2000 Oct; 34(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 11105117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of asbestos exposure assessments by next-of-kin respondents, by an occupational hygienist, and by a job-exposure matrix from the National Occupational Hazard Survey. Nam JM; Rice C; Gail MH Am J Ind Med; 2005 May; 47(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 15828074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collection of occupational epidemiologic data: the use of surrogate respondents to provide occupational histories. Henneberger PK Occup Med; 1996; 11(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 8887375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proxy respondents in reproductive research: a comparison of self- and partner-reported data. Hatch MC; Misra D; Kabat GC; Kartzmer S Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Apr; 133(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 2021150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]