135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8173660)
1. Science, law, and the search for truth in the courtroom: lessons from Daubert v. Merrell Dow.
Bertin JE; Henifin MS
J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(1):6-20. PubMed ID: 8173660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Daubert v Merrell Dow. The Supreme Court tackles scientific evidence in the courtroom.
Gold JA; Zaremski MJ; Lev ER; Shefrin DH
JAMA; 1993 Dec 22-29; 270(24):2964-7. PubMed ID: 8018140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow: missed opportunity.
Jackson KA
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(1):71-93. PubMed ID: 10342987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the admissibility of expert testimony.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 Jan; 45(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 8125472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Admissibility of scientific testimony into evidence.
Brushwood DB
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Mar; 51(5):683-5. PubMed ID: 8203391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bendectin case dismissed.
Barinaga M
Science; 1995 Jan; 267(5195):167. PubMed ID: 7809619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court to weigh science.
Marshall E
Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5095):588-90. PubMed ID: 8338515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court ruling on 'junk science' gives judges more say about what expert witness testimony to allow.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):423. PubMed ID: 8320770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Additional follow-up of congenital limb disorders in relation to Bendectin use.
Aselton PJ; Jick H
JAMA; 1983 Jul; 250(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 6682906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Debendox is not thalidomide.
Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):205-6. PubMed ID: 6146759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The debendox saga.
Orme ML
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Oct; 291(6500):918-9. PubMed ID: 3929963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bendectin.
DeSesso JM
Reprod Toxicol; 2001; 15(6):733. PubMed ID: 11738529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bendectin--birth defects controversy.
Newman SA
JAMA; 1990 Aug; 264(5):569-70. PubMed ID: 2366291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dr. Brent and scientific debate.
Newman SA
Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 10453908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Concern for truth: driving defensively when confronting a zombie epidemic.
Howland RH
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 2013 Nov; 51(11):9-12. PubMed ID: 24124694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The innocent bystander. Doxylamine/dicyclomine/pyridoxine and congenital limb defects.
McCredie J; Kricker A; Elliott J; Forrest J
Med J Aust; 1984 Apr; 140(9):525-7. PubMed ID: 6708895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to Dr. Brent's commentary on "Dr. Brent and scientific debate".
Newman SA
Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 10532797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bendectin: review of the medical literature of a comprehensively studied human nonteratogen and the most prevalent tortogen-litigen.
Scialli AR
Reprod Toxicol; 1999; 13(4):239. PubMed ID: 10453907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal malformation after Debendox treatment in early pregnancy.
Br Med J; 1978 Apr; 1(6119):1055-6. PubMed ID: 638604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Drug therapy in pregnancy: the lessons of diethylstilbestrol, thalidomide, and bendectin.
Saunders EJ; Saunders JA
Health Care Women Int; 1990; 11(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 2228814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
