These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8173877)
1. Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. Geleijns J; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Broerse JJ Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):360-5. PubMed ID: 8173877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction? Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography. van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations. Nishizawa K; Mori S; Ohno M; Yanagawa N; Yoshida T; Akahane K; Iwai K; Wada S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17595212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of organ and effective doses using anthropomorphic phantom: A comparison between experimental measurement and a commercial dose calculator. Akyea-Larbi KO; Hasford F; Inkoom S; Tetteh MA; Gyekye PK Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 37864985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient doses from standard and spiral CT of the head using a fast twin-beam system. Seifert H; Hagen T; Bartylla K; Blass G; Piepgras U Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1139-45. PubMed ID: 9536905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of effective and organ dose estimation in CT when using mA modulation: A single scanner pilot study. Tootell A; Szczepura K; Hogg P Radiography (Lond); 2017 May; 23(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28390549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters]. Koller F; Roth J Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique. Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements. Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of radiochromic film dosimetry protocol for volumetric dose assessments to various organs during diagnostic CT procedures. Brady S; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Frus D Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4782-92. PubMed ID: 20964198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification. Jurik AG; Jensen LC; Hansen J Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):651-4. PubMed ID: 8915269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation exposure in urology: a genitourinary catalogue for diagnostic imaging. Neisius A; Wang AJ; Wang C; Nguyen G; Tsivian M; Kuntz NJ; Astroza GM; Lowry C; Toncheva G; Yoshizumi TT; Preminger GM; Ferrandino MN; Lipkin ME J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2117-23. PubMed ID: 23764073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose reduction in multi-slice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation ("ECG pulsing"): phantom measurements. Poll LW; Cohnen M; Brachten S; Ewen K; Mödder U Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1500-5. PubMed ID: 12471520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control. Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols. Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Estimation of exposure dose on MDCT examination--the measurement of organ dose and effective dose by anthropomorphic phantom]. Hirata T; Inoue K; Shigemori S; Matsuzaki M; Inatomi K Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Aug; 66(8):901-10. PubMed ID: 20953106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography]. Becker C; Schätzl M; Feist H; Bäuml A; Schöpf UJ; Michalski G; Lechel U; Hengge M; Brüning R; Reiser M Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 10071653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom. Koyama S; Aoyama T; Oda N; Yamauchi-Kawaura C Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4298-306. PubMed ID: 20879590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]