313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8174008)
1. Elective cesarean section for macrosomia?
Yan JS; Chang YK; Yin CS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1994 Mar; 53(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8174008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neonatal outcomes of macrosomic infants of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers.
Cordero L; Paetow P; Landon MB; Nankervis CA
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2015; 8(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 26410433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section?
Langer O; Berkus MD; Huff RW; Samueloff A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 165(4 Pt 1):831-7. PubMed ID: 1951539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of labour and perinatal complications in case of foetus weight over 4000 g].
Piasek G; Starzewski J; Chil A; Wrona-Cyranowska A; Gutowski J; Anisiewicz A; Pejas-Dembowska R; Malmur M; Krawczyk J; Rudziński R
Wiad Lek; 2006; 59(5-6):326-31. PubMed ID: 17017476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience.
Lipscomb KR; Gregory K; Shaw K
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 7898833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
Rozenberg P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries.
Conway DL; Langer O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 May; 178(5):922-5. PubMed ID: 9609560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Delivery of large baby after cesarean section: role of trial of labor. Apropos of 355 cases].
Aboulfalah A; Abbassi H; El Karroumi M; Morsad F; Samouh N; Matar N; El Mansouri A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Jun; 29(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 10844329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases.
Raio L; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Buttarelli M; Franchi M; Dürig P; Brühwiler H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Aug; 109(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 12860334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Perinatal risk in significant macrosomia. A study based on the databank of the Professional Society of Swiss Gynecologic Clinics 1983-1992].
Bleichenbacher M; Haenel AF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Jun; 55(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 7657143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Sentilhes L; Sénat MV; Boulogne AI; Deneux-Tharaux C; Fuchs F; Legendre G; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Schmitz T; Lejeune-Saada V
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():156-61. PubMed ID: 27318182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors].
Schmitz T
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1261-71. PubMed ID: 26530180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable?
Gonen R; Spiegel D; Abend M
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):526-9. PubMed ID: 8841211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Macrosomia, shoulder dystocia and elongation of the brachial plexus: what is the role of caesarean section?].
Kehila M; Derouich S; Touhami O; Belghith S; Abouda HS; Cheour M; Chanoufi MB
Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 25():217. PubMed ID: 28270907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal macrosomia: does antenatal prediction affect delivery route and birth outcome?
Weeks JW; Pitman T; Spinnato JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1215-9. PubMed ID: 7485323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extreme macrosomia--obstetric outcomes and complications in birthweights >5000 g.
Hehir MP; Mchugh AF; Maguire PJ; Mahony R
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Feb; 55(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 25688818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies.
Weissmann-Brenner A; Simchen MJ; Zilberberg E; Kalter A; Weisz B; Achiron R; Dulitzky M
Med Sci Monit; 2012 Sep; 18(9):PH77-81. PubMed ID: 22936200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery.
Gonen R; Bader D; Ajami M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 11084580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
