283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8174059)
1. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions.
Weber WP; Engelberger S; Viehl CT; Zanetti-Dallenbach R; Kuster S; Dirnhofer S; Wruk D; Oertli D; Marti WR
World J Surg; 2008 Dec; 32(12):2599-606. PubMed ID: 18836763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins.
Cendán JC; Coco D; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Aug; 201(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 16038815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.
Esbona K; Li Z; Wilke LG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3236-45. PubMed ID: 22847119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is intraoperative frozen section analysis of reexcision specimens of value in preventing reoperation in breast-conserving therapy?
Jorns JM; Daignault S; Sabel MS; Wu AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Nov; 142(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 25319974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine frozen-section analysis of breast margins compared with reoperation for positive margins.
Osborn JB; Keeney GL; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Boughey JC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3204-9. PubMed ID: 21861234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Osako T; Nishimura R; Nishiyama Y; Okumura Y; Tashima R; Nakano M; Fujisue M; Toyozumi Y; Arima N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Dec; 20(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 25855313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing Resection Margin Status in Breast-conserving Surgery Specimens: Comparison Among Gross Evaluation, Frozen Section Analysis, and Permanent Section Diagnosis in 725 Patients With Breast Cancer.
DO J; Chu J; Ahn J; Bae GE; Lee SH; Kim HS; DO SI
Anticancer Res; 2022 Sep; 42(9):4453-4460. PubMed ID: 36039453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery.
Kearney TJ; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 1995 Jul; 2(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 7552618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of frozen section in the intra-operative margin assessment during breast conserving surgery.
Anila KR; Chandramohan K; Mathews A; Somanathan T; Jayasree K
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(2):235-238. PubMed ID: 28071617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.
Ku NN; Cox CE; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 1718113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Neuschatz AC; DiPetrillo T; Steinhoff M; Safaii H; Yunes M; Landa M; Chung M; Cady B; Wazer DE
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(7):1917-24. PubMed ID: 11932892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions.
Cao D; Lin C; Woo SH; Vang R; Tsangaris TN; Argani P
Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Dec; 29(12):1625-32. PubMed ID: 16327435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
