These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8174243)

  • 1. Process capability and stability of analytical systems assessed from proficiency testing data.
    Jenny RW
    Clin Chem; 1994 May; 40(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 8174243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proficiency test performance as a predictor of accuracy of routine patient testing for theophylline.
    Jenny RW; Jackson KY
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jan; 39(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 8419063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Charts of operational process specifications ("OPSpecs charts") for assessing the precision, accuracy, and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1226-33; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How good are clinical laboratories? An assessment of current performance.
    Rej R; Jenny RW
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1210-7; discussion 1218-25. PubMed ID: 1623585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cholesterol operational process specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Wiebe DA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1938-44. PubMed ID: 1934469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cholesterol--a model system to relate medical needs with analytical performance.
    Wiebe DA; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1504-12; discussion 1512-3. PubMed ID: 8330412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European specifications for imprecision and inaccuracy compared with operating specifications that assure the quality required by US CLIA proficiency-testing criteria.
    Westgard JO; Seehafer JJ; Barry PL
    Clin Chem; 1994 Jul; 40(7 Pt 1):1228-32. PubMed ID: 8013091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utilizing global data to estimate analytical performance on the Sigma scale: A global comparative analysis of methods, instruments, and manufacturers through external quality assurance and proficiency testing programs.
    Westgard SA
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Jun; 49(9):699-707. PubMed ID: 26948097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the rigor and appropriateness of CLIA '88 toxicology proficiency testing standards.
    Jenny RW; Jackson KY
    Clin Chem; 1992 Apr; 38(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 1568313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proficiency testing linked to the national reference system for the clinical laboratory: a proposal for achieving accuracy.
    Lasky FD
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1260-7; discussion 1268-72. PubMed ID: 1623591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Limitations of proficiency testing under CLIA '67.
    Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS; Lanphear BJ; Burmeister BJ; Hassemer DJ
    Clin Chem; 1992 Jul; 38(7):1237-44; discussion 1245-50. PubMed ID: 1623588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management.
    Ricós C; García-Victoria M; de la Fuente B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 15259371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proficiency testing performance: a case study with modeling.
    Waugh JM; Collier CP; Day AG; Waugh M; Raymond MJ
    Clin Biochem; 2002 Sep; 35(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 12413605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Shewhart p control charts of external quality-assurance program data to monitor analytical performance of a clinical chemistry laboratory.
    Chesher D; Burnett L
    Clin Chem; 1996 Sep; 42(9):1478-82. PubMed ID: 8787708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical need for quality specifications--a NORDKEM project for selecting the appropriate quality in clinical laboratories.
    de Verdier CH; Groth T; Hyltoft Petersen P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 215():29-37. PubMed ID: 8327849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical performances of food microbiology laboratories - critical analysis of 7 years of proficiency testing results.
    Abdel Massih M; Planchon V; Polet M; Dierick K; Mahillon J
    J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 120(2):346-54. PubMed ID: 26599261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causes of unsatisfactory performance in proficiency testing.
    Jenny RW; Jackson-Tarentino KY
    Clin Chem; 2000 Jan; 46(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 10620576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance characteristics of several rules for self-interpretation of proficiency testing data.
    Carey RN; Cembrowski GS; Garber CC; Zaki Z
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 16048412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Desirable analytical quality specifications for clinical chemistry laboratories.
    de Verdier CH; Groth T
    Clin Chem; 1994 Jan; 40(1):168-70. PubMed ID: 8287535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.