62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8175849)
1. Combined survivorship and multivariate analyses of revisions in 799 hip prostheses. A 10- to 20-year review of mechanical loosening.
Johnsson R; Franzén H; Nilsson LT
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 May; 76(3):439-43. PubMed ID: 8175849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision for aseptic stem loosening using the cemented Charnley prosthesis. A review of 351 hips.
Raut VV; Siney PD; Wroblewski BM
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Jan; 77(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 7822390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow-up of cemented total hip replacement for osteoarthritis.
Brick GW; Poss R
Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 14(3):565-77. PubMed ID: 3222495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term survivorship of cemented all-polyethylene acetabular components in patients > 75 years of age.
Levy BA; Berry DJ; Pagnano MW
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 10884206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients.
Lie SA; Engesaeter LB; Havelin LI; Gjessing HK; Vollset SE
Stat Med; 2004 Oct; 23(20):3227-40. PubMed ID: 15449328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals.
Flugsrud GB; Nordsletten L; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Meyer HE
Acta Orthop; 2007 Feb; 78(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 17453400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult.
Callaghan JJ; Forest EE; Sporer SM; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Nov; (344):257-62. PubMed ID: 9372776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Mäkelä K; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Dec; 90(12):1562-9. PubMed ID: 19043125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ten-year survivorship of rough-surfaced femoral stem with geometry similar to Charnley femoral stem.
Datir SP; Kurta IC; Wynn-Jones CH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 16627148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders.
Malkani AL; Settecerri JJ; Sim FH; Chao EY; Wallrichs SL
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 May; 77(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 7744913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-related risk factors leading to aseptic stem loosening in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study of 5,035 patients.
Münger P; Röder C; Ackermann-Liebrich U; Busato A
Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):567-74. PubMed ID: 16929432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weber rotation total hip replacement: a prospective 5- to 20-year followup study.
de Jong PT; van der Vis HM; de Man FH; Marti RK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Feb; (419):107-14. PubMed ID: 15021140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoral impaction bone grafting with the Exeter stem - the Swedish experience: survivorship analysis of 1305 revisions performed between 1989 and 2002.
Ornstein E; Linder L; Ranstam J; Lewold S; Eisler T; Torper M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 19336801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses.
Kärrholm J; Borssén B; Löwenhielm G; Snorrason F
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1994 Nov; 76(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 7983118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conus hip prosthesis.
Wagner H; Wagner M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
