These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8176053)

  • 1. Annoyance perception of sound and information extraction.
    Berglund B; Harder K; Preis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1501-9. PubMed ID: 8176053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sophisticated and naïve listeners' magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech annoyance.
    Ellis LW; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1231-4. PubMed ID: 10939074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):529-42. PubMed ID: 11508977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgments of speech intelligibility and speech annoyance by mothers of children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
    Ellis LW; Pakulski L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):324-8. PubMed ID: 12705540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech privacy and annoyance considerations in the acoustic environment of passenger cars of high-speed trains.
    Jeon JY; Hong JY; Jang HS; Kim JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3976-84. PubMed ID: 26723351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech acceptability.
    Ellis LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):625-30. PubMed ID: 10483655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype.
    Zokoll MA; Wagener KC; Brand T; Buschermöhle M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilingual listeners' perception of temporally manipulated English passages.
    Shi LF; Farooq N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 22199197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory disruption by irrelevant noise-vocoded speech: Effects of native language and the number of frequency bands.
    Ellermeier W; Kattner F; Ueda K; Doumoto K; Nakajima Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1561-9. PubMed ID: 26428793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S; Hui SN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
    Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.