These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8176054)

  • 21. Selective adaptation to frequency-modulated tones: evidence for an information-processing channel selectively sensitive to frequency changes.
    Regan D; Tansley BW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 May; 65(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 458046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Across-channel masking of changes in modulation depth for amplitude- and frequency-modulated signals.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Gaunt T; Child T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):327-47. PubMed ID: 1775646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3119-31. PubMed ID: 1474227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.
    Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1295-301. PubMed ID: 2708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9714924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking.
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2320-31. PubMed ID: 8865639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation).
    Moore BC; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2468-78. PubMed ID: 7714263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dependence of frequency modulation detection on frequency modulation coherence across carriers: effects of modulation rate, harmonicity, and roving of the carrier frequencies.
    Furukawa S; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1632-43. PubMed ID: 9069630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of randomizing phase on the discrimination between amplitude-modulated and quasi-frequency-modulated tones.
    Tabuchi H; Borucki E; Berg BG
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):72-82. PubMed ID: 22609773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Masking of a brief probe by sinusoidal frequency modulation.
    Edwards BW; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Feb; 101(2):1010-8. PubMed ID: 9035393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of frequency and rate modulation by the chinchilla.
    Long GR; Clark WW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1184-90. PubMed ID: 6725767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of amplitude modulation on profile detection.
    Dai HP; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):836-45. PubMed ID: 1939888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Discrimination of the phase of amplitude modulation applied to different carriers: Effects of modulation rate and modulation depth for young and older subjects.
    Moore BCJ; Sęk AP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Sep; 146(3):1696. PubMed ID: 31590555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fringe effects in modulation masking.
    Bacon SP; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3451-5. PubMed ID: 1619121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1683-94. PubMed ID: 2341672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Discrimination and identification of modulation rate using a noise carrier.
    Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2122-8. PubMed ID: 1597603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Asymmetry of masking between noise and iterated rippled noise: evidence for time-interval processing in the auditory system.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Nobbe A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2096-107. PubMed ID: 11681387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform.
    He NJ; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77. PubMed ID: 17614504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones.
    Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):329-40. PubMed ID: 2002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.