171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 817662)
1. Comparison and evaluation of ticarcillin and carbenicillin using disk diffusion methods.
Parry MF; Neu HC
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Apr; 9(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 817662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agar disk diffusion susceptibility characteristics of azlocillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin.
Phaneuf D; Neu HC
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Nov; 16(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 118706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ticarcillin and carbenicillin activity against random and select populations Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Prior RB; Fass RJ
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Feb; 13(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 417671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of mezlocillin, piperacillin, Bay k 4999 with carbenicillin and ticarcillin against enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Sobel JD; Levison ME; Kaye D
Infection; 1980; 8(3):121-2. PubMed ID: 6448229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, and cefamandole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae.
Shah PP; Briedis DJ; Robson HG; Conterato JP
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Mar; 15(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 111609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity to carbenicillin and ticarcillin, and the beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK in 1978-79.
King JD; Farmer T; Reading C; Sutherland R
J Clin Pathol; 1980 Mar; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 6769973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the effects of ticarcillin and carbenicillin upon Psuedomonas aeruginosa.
Kalkani E; Marketos N
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jan; 9(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 816248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Piperacillin susceptibility tests by the single-disk agar diffusion technique.
Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Badal RE; Baker CN; Jones RN; Gerlach EH
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Sep; 16(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 507794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disk diffusion and serial dilution tests of susceptibility of some pathogenic gram-negative bacilli and enterococci to carbenicillin and ampicillin.
Garner C; Rosner B; Finland M
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Aug; 8(2):172-86. PubMed ID: 810078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro activity of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, sisomicin and netilmicin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Watanakunakorn C; Glotzbecker C
Chemotherapy; 1978; 24(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 100282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed ticarcillin disk control values for Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: multicenter cooperative study.
Prior RB; Fass RJ
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Sep; 14(3):507-8. PubMed ID: 101134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inability of carbenicillin to predict ticarcillin activity versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa by disc-agar diffusion.
Flournoy DJ
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 1982; 4(2):119-20. PubMed ID: 6811811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Susceptibility of the anaerobic bacteria, group D streptococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas to semisynthetic penicillins: carbenicillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin.
Monif GR; Clark PR; Shuster JJ; Baer H
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Nov; 14(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 103491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BL-P1654, ticarcillin, and carbenicillin: in vitro comparison alone and in combination with gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Wald ER; Standiford HC; Tatem BA; Calia FM; Hornick RB
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Mar; 7(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 806263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative in vitro activity of piribenicillin, ticarcillin, and carbenicillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Murakawa T; Sabath LD
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Jan; 11(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 13704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of two standardized disk methods for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and of the Enterobacteriaceae.
Barry AL; Effinger LJ
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1974 Oct; 6(4):452-9. PubMed ID: 4157344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Apalcillin: in vitro activity compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin against Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter].
Quentin C; Sageaux JC; Bebear C; Latrille J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1983 Jun; 31(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 6224123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison and evaluation of carbenicillin disks in diffusion susceptibility testing.
Matsen JM; Lund ME; Brooker DC
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1974 Jun; 5(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 15825412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative in-vitro activity of ticarcillin and carbenicillin against 100 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Pearman JW; Kosaras FP; Harper WE
Med J Aust; 1978 Apr; 1(8):452-4. PubMed ID: 96319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro activity of ticarcillin, carbenicillin and ampicillin against some gram-negative bacilli.
Legakis NJ; Papavassiliou J
J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1975 Nov; 28(11):912-9. PubMed ID: 811636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
