These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8176812)

  • 1. National Eye Institute study under investigation.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1994 May; 271(19):1470-1. PubMed ID: 8176812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer. How not to publicize a misconduct finding.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1994 Mar; 263(5154):1679. PubMed ID: 8134830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NCI trial hearing elicits vow of more oversight.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1994 May; 271(18):1391. PubMed ID: 8176788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whither NCI and NSABP?
    Cohn I
    Arch Surg; 1994 Oct; 129(10):1005-9; discussion 1009-10. PubMed ID: 7944928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer: a diagnosis of deceit.
    Gorman C
    Time; 1994 Mar; 143(13):52-3. PubMed ID: 11652287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'Verdicts' are in on the Gallo probe.
    Palca J
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5058):735-8. PubMed ID: 1589751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH finds fraud in cell paper.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552-4. PubMed ID: 2011731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.