These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8177154)
1. Optimization of beam parameters for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Van Lysel MS Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 8177154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. McCollough CH; Van Lysel MS; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 2586373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy subtraction angiography is comparable to digital subtraction angiography in terms of iodine Rose SNR. Burton CS; Mayo JR; Cunningham IA Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5925. PubMed ID: 27806612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A theoretical comparison of x-ray angiographic image quality using energy-dependent and conventional subtraction methods. Tanguay J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 22225282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography. Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography. Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CCD camera for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Molloi S; Ersahin A; Qian YJ IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995; 14(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 18215878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations of the lead oxide vidicon for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Van Lysel MS IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1991; 10(4):530-7. PubMed ID: 18222858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive digital energy subtraction angiography with a channeling-radiation x-ray source. Gary CK; Piestrup MA; Boyers DG; Pincus CI; Pantell RH; Rothbart GB Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1527-35. PubMed ID: 8289737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Left ventricular dual-energy digital subtraction angiography: a motion immune digital subtraction technique. Van Lysel MS; Miller WP; Senior DG; Gupta VK; Ende DJ; Albright DJ Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 1753160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification. Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system. Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Filter wheel equalization in DSA: simulation results. Boone JM; Gardiner GA; Levin DC Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):439-48. PubMed ID: 8497236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system. Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Star-Lack JM; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2728-43. PubMed ID: 16964848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Densitometric assessment of regional left ventricular systolic function during graded ischemia in the dog by use of dual-energy digital subtraction ventriculography. McCollough CH; Miller WP; Van Lysel MS; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Albright DJ Am Heart J; 1993 Jun; 125(6):1667-75. PubMed ID: 8498309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of head dual energy computed tomography angiography and neuro digital subtraction angiography]. Xu Y; Wen L; Han D; Ma CW Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 21219804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Work in progress: the application of temporal filtering techniques to hybrid subtraction in digital subtraction angiography. Riederer SJ; Brody WR; Enzmann DR; Hall AL; Maier JK Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):859-62. PubMed ID: 6342036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier. Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement. Saito M Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]