These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8177158)

  • 1. Measurement of image intensifier system modulation transfer function by video signal analysis.
    McRobbie DW; Nieto-Camero JJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 8177158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for the modulation transfer function of cardiovascular x-ray systems.
    Rezaee MR; van der Zwet PM; Gerbrands JJ; Reiber JH
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 8675424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function.
    Maidment AD; Albert M
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 12607842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Optimization of dynamic fuzziness and enhancement of image quality of an URI/230-Amethyst digital image intensifier].
    Blinov AB; Kozlovskiĭ EB; Luzin SI; Plutov IG; Rodin VI
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12512273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images.
    Saunders RS; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3006-17. PubMed ID: 14655948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [DS-1000--a new digital image intensifier film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis].
    Schuler M; Hübsch T; Rienmüller R; Frey J; Schmidt H
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1988 Mar; 8(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 3383536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
    Workman A; Brettle DS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Logarithmic amplifier for computed tomography tasks using fluoroscopic projections.
    Buliev I; Badea C; Pallikarakis N
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(6):247-52. PubMed ID: 12490030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the accuracy of MTF measurement at low frequencies based on oversampled edge spread function deconvolution.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Hao T; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 26410662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation.
    Neitzel U; Buhr E; Hilgers G; Granfors PR
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3485-91. PubMed ID: 15651631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image resolution of a microchannel plate x-ray image intensifier.
    Gould RG
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 634230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression.
    Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monotone spline regression for accurate MTF measurement at low frequencies.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Liu H
    Opt Express; 2014 Sep; 22(19):22446-55. PubMed ID: 25321715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.