These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8177160)

  • 1. A formal study of lateral magnification and its influence on mammographic imaging sharpness.
    Schiabel H; Ventura A; Frère AF
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 8177160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique.
    Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjarngard BE
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
    Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 18296767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.
    Tanaka N; Naka K; Fukushima H; Morishita J; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 21416317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 May; 66(785):441-6. PubMed ID: 8319066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of breast thickness and lesion location on resolution in digital magnification mammography.
    Park HS; Oh Y; Kim ST; Kim HJ
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 22726961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.
    Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Whitman GJ; Johnston DA; Yang WT; Selinko V; Arribas E; Dogan B; Kappadath SC
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):182-94. PubMed ID: 15719969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Critical comment on enlargement techniques in diagnostic radiology (author's transl)].
    Schmidt-Hieber M; Strecker E-P
    Rofo; 1975 Aug; 123(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 129378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality in mammography with special reference to anti-scatter grids and the magnification technique.
    Nielsen B; Fagerberg G
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(4):467-79. PubMed ID: 3776678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
    Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
    Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
    Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Monte Carlo study of the influence of focal spot size, intensity distribution, breast thickness and magnification on spatial resolution of an a-Se digital mammography system using the generalized MTF.
    Sakellaris T; Koutalonis M; Spyrou G; Pascoal A
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 24011672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies.
    Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Direct radiological magnification of thin objects compared with contact exposures and mammographic techniques (author's transl)].
    Franken T
    Rofo; 1982 Apr; 136(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 6212485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.