These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8177960)

  • 1. Overlapping mental operations in serial performance with preview.
    Pashler H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 Feb; 47(1):161-91; discussion 193-9, 201-5. PubMed ID: 8177960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexibility of individual multitasking strategies in task-switching with preview: are preferences for serial versus overlapping task processing dependent on between-task conflict?
    Brüning J; Manzey D
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 28983726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance.
    Reissland J; Manzey D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():27-40. PubMed ID: 27155317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.
    Fagot C; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1058-79. PubMed ID: 1431744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How much processing do nonattended stimuli receive? Apparently very little, but...
    Eriksen CW; Webb JM; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):477-88. PubMed ID: 2349060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 16151721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.
    Mattes A; Tavera F; Ophey A; Roheger M; Gaschler R; Haider H
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1529-1552. PubMed ID: 32335762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement?
    Ruthruff E; Pashler HE; Klaassen A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11340869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance.
    De Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Oct; 19(5):965-80. PubMed ID: 8228846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task switching and action sequencing.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):526-40. PubMed ID: 16328435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance.
    De Jong R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):2-25. PubMed ID: 7754082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.