These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8178785)

  • 1. Telephone sampling in epidemiologic research: to reap the benefits, avoid the pitfalls.
    Potthoff RF
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 May; 139(10):967-78. PubMed ID: 8178785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of telephone sampling and area sampling: response rates and within-household coverage.
    Brogan DJ; Denniston MM; Liff JM; Flagg EW; Coates RJ; Brinton LA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jun; 153(11):1119-27. PubMed ID: 11390332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of the Waksberg telephone sampling method for the selection of population controls.
    Perneger TV; Myers TL; Klag MJ; Whelton PK
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 138(8):574-84. PubMed ID: 8237981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of geographic clustering of population samples selected using different methods of random digit dialing.
    Davis S; Ross A; Voigt LF; Heuser L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jul; 132(1 Suppl):S144-55. PubMed ID: 2356827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telephone household screening and interviewing.
    Harlow BL; Hartge P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1983 May; 117(5):632-3. PubMed ID: 6846319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing response bias in random-digit dialling surveys: the telephone-prefix method.
    Diehr P; Koepsell TD; Cheadle A; Psaty BM
    Stat Med; 1992 Jun; 11(8):1009-21. PubMed ID: 1496189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two one-step methods for household screening and interviewing using random digit dialing.
    Harlow BL; Davis S
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Apr; 127(4):857-63. PubMed ID: 3354550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evaluation of the data collection process for a multicenter, population-based, case-control design.
    Wingo PA; Ory HW; Layde PM; Lee NC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jul; 128(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 3381827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Some problems related to the collection of demographic data in the population censuses taken in Latin America during the 1980s].
    Arretx C; Chackiel J
    Notas Poblacion; 1986 Dec; 14(42):51-76. PubMed ID: 12314803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Telephone surveys as a method for obtaining dietary information: a review.
    Fox TA; Heimendinger J; Block G
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1992 Jun; 92(6):729-32. PubMed ID: 1607571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies.
    Olson SH; Kelsey JL; Pearson TA; Levin B
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Jan; 135(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 1536136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Random digit dialing: the potential effect on sample characteristics of the conversion of nonresidential telephone numbers.
    Voigt LF; Davis S; Heuser L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 Dec; 136(11):1393-9. PubMed ID: 1488966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in health estimates using telephone and door-to-door survey methods--a hypothetical exercise.
    Taylor AW; Wilson DH; Wakefield M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1998 Apr; 22(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 9744181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does sampling using random digit dialling really cost more than sampling from telephone directories: debunking the myths.
    Yang B; Eyeson-Annan M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():6. PubMed ID: 16504117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of control subjects recruited by random digit dialing and area survey.
    Lele C; Holly EA; Roseman DS; Thomas DB
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Oct; 140(7):643-8. PubMed ID: 7942764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Random digit dialing in selecting a population-based control group.
    Hartge P; Brinton LA; Rosenthal JF; Cahill JI; Hoover RN; Waksberg J
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Dec; 120(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 6334439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of methods for identifying a population-based sample of Filipina women for a health survey.
    Hoggatt KJ; Stewart SL; Pasick R; Sabogal F; Tuason N; McBride MR; Duenas GV; Horn-Ross PL
    Ethn Dis; 2004; 14(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 15002919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences between RDD telephone and ABS mail survey design: coverage, unit nonresponse, and measurement error.
    Peytchev A; Ridenhour J; Krotki K
    J Health Commun; 2010; 15 Suppl 3():117-34. PubMed ID: 21154088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of random digit dialing in selecting matched controls for a case-control study of pediatric cancer.
    Ward EM; Kramer S; Meadows AT
    Am J Epidemiol; 1984 Oct; 120(4):582-91. PubMed ID: 6475927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation tools for reducing the impact of sampling and nonresponse errors in dual-frame RDD telephone surveys.
    Wolter KM; Ganesh N; Copeland KR; Singleton JA; Khare M
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4718-4732. PubMed ID: 31418889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.