BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

799 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8178903)

  • 1. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subdermal progestin implant contraception.
    Darney PD
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 1908716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subdermal contraceptive implants.
    Peralta O; Diaz S; Croxatto H
    J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 1995 Jun; 53(1-6):223-6. PubMed ID: 7626459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metabolic parameter, bleeding, and weight changes in U.S. women using progestin only contraceptives.
    Mainwaring R; Hales HA; Stevenson K; Hatasaka HH; Poulson AM; Jones KP; Peterson CM
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7621683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vaginal bleeding patterns of women using different contraceptive methods (implants, injectables, IUDs, oral pills)--an Indian experience. An ICMR Task Force Study. Indian Council of Medical Research.
    Datey S; Gaur LN; Saxena BN
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):155-65. PubMed ID: 7621684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New concepts in contraception: Norplant subdermal implant.
    Lynn MM; Holdcroft C
    Nurse Pract; 1992 Mar; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 1565306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
    Power J; French R; Cowan F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; 2007(3):CD001326. PubMed ID: 17636668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.
    Coukell AJ; Balfour JA
    Drugs; 1998 Jun; 55(6):861-87. PubMed ID: 9617600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NORPLANT contraceptive implants advancing.
    Segal SJ
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 12279797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I; Campodonico I; Kiriwat O; Holma P; Diaz S; Wan L; Biswas A; Viegas O; el din Abdalla K; Anant MP; Pavez M; Stern J
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception.
    Buckshee K; Chatterjee P; Dhall GI; Hazra MN; Kodkany BS; Lalitha K; Logambal A; Manchanda P; Nanda UK; RaiChoudhury G
    Contraception; 1995 Apr; 51(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7796589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Injectable and implantable contraceptives.
    Cullins VE
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 4(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 1387011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.
    Sivin I
    Drug Saf; 2003; 26(5):303-35. PubMed ID: 12650633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
    Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Norplant implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
    Peers T; Stevens JE; Graham J; Davey A
    Contraception; 1996 Jun; 53(6):345-51. PubMed ID: 8773421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Norplant contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
    Pasquale SA; Brandeis V; Cruz RI; Kelly S; Sweeney M
    Contraception; 1987 Sep; 36(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 3119287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
    Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.