These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8179146)

  • 1. Improving the induction characteristics of methohexitone. A study of the effect of adding thiopentone to methohexitone.
    Raphael JH; Bexton MD
    Anaesthesia; 1994 Apr; 49(4):338-40. PubMed ID: 8179146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Total intravenous anaesthesia for direct laryngoscopy: propofol infusion compared to thiopentone combined with midazolam and methohexitone infusion.
    Sonne NM; Clausen TG; Valentin N; Halck S; Munksgaard A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1992 Apr; 36(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 1574973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the ocular effects of atropine or glycopyrrolate with two I.V. induction agents.
    Greenan J; Prasad J
    Br J Anaesth; 1985 Feb; 57(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 3970797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pain on injection of methohexitone. The use of lignocaine to modify pain on injection of methohexitone during anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy.
    Simpson KH; Halsall PJ; Sides CA; Keeler JF
    Anaesthesia; 1989 Aug; 44(8):688-9. PubMed ID: 2782576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low dose sufentanil pretreatment. Effect on the induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone, methohexitone or midazolam.
    Furness G; Dundee JW; Milligan KR
    Anaesthesia; 1987 Dec; 42(12):1264-6. PubMed ID: 2893561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of propofol induction with thiopentone or methohexitone in short outpatient general anaesthesia.
    Raeder JC; Misvaer G
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1988 Nov; 32(8):607-13. PubMed ID: 3063044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of induction characteristics of four intravenous anaesthetic agents.
    McCollum JS; Dundee JW
    Anaesthesia; 1986 Oct; 41(10):995-1000. PubMed ID: 3491551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of thiopentone and methohexitone as induction agents for Caesarean section.
    Morgan M; Holdcroft A; Whitwam JG
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1980 Nov; 8(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 7457812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recovery from intravenous anaesthesia. Comparison of disoprofol with thiopentone and methohexitone.
    Bahar M; Dundee JW; O'Neill MP; Briggs LP; Moore J; Merrett JD
    Anaesthesia; 1982 Dec; 37(12):1171-5. PubMed ID: 6983839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the new emulsion formulation of propofol with methohexitone and thiopentone for induction of anaesthesia in day cases.
    Mackenzie N; Grant IS
    Br J Anaesth; 1985 Aug; 57(8):725-31. PubMed ID: 3874640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prevention of pain on injection. A study of the effect of intravenous lignocaine before methohexitone.
    Millar JM; Barr AM
    Anaesthesia; 1981 Sep; 36(9):878-80. PubMed ID: 7030121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which intravenous induction agent for day surgery? A comparison of propofol, thiopentone, methohexitone and etomidate.
    Heath PJ; Kennedy DJ; Ogg TW; Dunling C; Gilks WR
    Anaesthesia; 1988 May; 43(5):365-8. PubMed ID: 3261140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methohexitone and thiopentone. Response to stimuli and incidence of some side effects.
    Barry CT; Guy J; Goat V; Buchan AS
    Br J Anaesth; 1971 Oct; 43(10):963-72. PubMed ID: 5115033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical studies on induction agents. 28. A further comparison of venous complications following thiopentone, methohexitone and propanidid.
    O'Donnell JF; Hewitt JC; Dundee JW
    Br J Anaesth; 1969 Aug; 41(8):681-3. PubMed ID: 4897470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anaesthetic induction of caesarean section with thiopentone, methohexitone and ketamine.
    Houlton PC; Downing JW; Buley RJ; Brock-Utne JG
    S Afr Med J; 1978 Nov; 54(20):818-20. PubMed ID: 33455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anesthesia with alfentanil and methohexitone for short gynecological surgery. A comparison with thiopentone/nitrous oxide.
    Bernstein K; Wirpszo R; Djärv L
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1989 Aug; 33(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 2800986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical comparison of the incidence and duration of apnoea following methohexitone and thiopentone.
    WHITWAM JG
    Br J Anaesth; 1962 Oct; 34():729-32. PubMed ID: 14000438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical studies of induction agents. XLIII: recovery from althesin--a comparative study with thiopentone and methohexitone.
    Carson IW; Graham J; Dundee JW
    Br J Anaesth; 1975 Mar; 47(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 1138743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A controlled investigation of propofol, thiopentone and methohexitone.
    Gold MI; Abraham EC; Herrington C
    Can J Anaesth; 1987 Sep; 34(5):478-83. PubMed ID: 3499244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some studies on the properties of the intravenous anaesthetic, propofol ('Diprivan')--a review.
    Grounds RM; Morgan M; Lumley J
    Postgrad Med J; 1985; 61 Suppl 3():90-5. PubMed ID: 3903720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.