These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8179957)
1. Cervical smears. Curtis P; Mintzer M; Hendrix S; Resnick J; Morrell D Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Feb; 44(379):94-5. PubMed ID: 8179957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average]. van Rijswijk A Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average]. Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New cervical cancer screening guidelines. Health News; 2003 Jan; 9(1):9. PubMed ID: 12545955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cervical smears and evaluation of quality]. Marsan C Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 9004721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Those gland problems in cervical cytology: faith or fact? Observations from the Bethesda 2001 terminology conference. Moriarty AT; Wilbur D Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 12672090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to "access to cervical cancer screening: training internists so skill limitations are not a barrier to care". Savard M J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Apr; 16(3):429. PubMed ID: 17439388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality improvement in family practice. Program for Pap smears. Norton PG; Shaw PA; Murray MA Can Fam Physician; 1997 Mar; 43():503-8. PubMed ID: 9116522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pap smears collected by nurse practitioners: a comparison with smears collected by medical practitioners. Mitchell H Oncol Nurs Forum; 1993 Jun; 20(5):807-10. PubMed ID: 8337173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Am J Nurs; 2003 Nov; 103(11):101-2, 105-6, 108-9. PubMed ID: 14625432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The cytology proficiency dilemma: the case for computer-based testing. Quarngesser SS Am Clin Lab; 1996; 15(10):18. PubMed ID: 10164049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the benchmark. Makers of a better, more costly Pap test face a tough sell. Hensley S Mod Healthc; 1997 May; 27(19):52. PubMed ID: 10173014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Physicians urged to recommend Pap tests to women ages 65 and older--new educational materials now available from NCI. NCI Del Med J; 2002 Mar; 74(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 11963351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears]. Weintraub D Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a Pap smear quality-assurance system in family practice. Curtis P; Varenholt JJ; Skinner B; Addison L; Resnick J; Kebede M Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 25(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8458544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A look at Pap test accuracy and the duty to inform from a risk management perspective. Meister S QRC Advis; 1997 Dec; 14(2):1, 5-8. PubMed ID: 10176015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cervical smears unsuitable for exclusion of cervical carcinoma]. Giard RW; Blok P Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 10674109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]