These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8180277)

  • 1. Comparative study of cutting efficiency of hand, gyromatic and path-finder root canal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.
    Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8180277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
    Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM analysis of smear layer removal after manual and automated handpiece root canal preparation.
    Sydney GB; Batista A; Estrela C; Pesce HF; de Melo LL
    Braz Dent J; 1996; 7(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9206350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Scanning electron microscopic studies on the efficacy of irrigated, hand root canal preparation].
    Klimm W; Buchmann G; Zenker F; Edelmann J
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 2144087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
    Beer R; Gängler P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of two rotary instrumentation techniques for cleaning the root canal.
    Kataia MA; Ezzat KM; el-Sayed JM; Seif RE
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr; 41(2):1113-9. PubMed ID: 9497647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls.
    Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
    J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The wall of the root canal after treatment with various instruments].
    Konopelski J; Kröncke A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 Feb; 34(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 284909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root canal preparation using the second harmonic KTP:YAG laser: a thermographic and scanning electron microscopic study.
    Machida T; Wilder-Smith P; Arrastia AM; Liaw LH; Berns MW
    J Endod; 1995 Feb; 21(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 7714444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.