These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8180434)

  • 1. Preferred real-ear insertion gain on a commercial hearing aid at different speech and noise levels.
    Kuk FK; Harper T; Doubek K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 8180434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of real-ear insertion gains in Japanese-speaking individuals wearing hearing aids with DSLv5 and NAL-NL2.
    Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Ogiwara A; Nakagawa T; Inoue R; Umehara S; Hara Y; Suzuki K; Yamashita T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Feb; 48(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 32747167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
    Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of automatic signal-processing amplification on speech recognition in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Dempsey JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1987; 96(3 Pt 1):251-3. PubMed ID: 3605946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Korhonen P; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):465-79. PubMed ID: 19764167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech understanding, subjective preference, and preferred gain.
    Korhonen P; Kuk F; Lau C; Keenan D; Schumacher J; Nielsen J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):845-58. PubMed ID: 24224991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wireless binaural hearing aid technology for telephone use and listening in wind noise.
    Au A; Blakeley JM; Dowell RC; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Apr; 58(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 30474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 3390637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy for hearing AIDS.
    Liu H; Zhang H; Bentler RA; Han D; Zhang L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):606-15. PubMed ID: 22967735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing AIDS and paired comparisons.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):556-68. PubMed ID: 21285878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits of adaptive FM systems on speech recognition in noise for listeners who use hearing aids.
    Thibodeau L
    Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 20220201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.