These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8180614)

  • 1. Marginal sealing ability of four restorative materials placed in root surfaces.
    Chan MF; Jones JC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Sep; 2(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 8180614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significance of thermal cycling in microleakage analysis of root restorations.
    Chan MF; Glyn Jones JC
    J Dent; 1994 Oct; 22(5):292-5. PubMed ID: 7525675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries.
    Burgess JO
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):342-51. PubMed ID: 8695014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resin-ionomer and hybrid-ionomer cements: Part I. Comparison of three materials for the treatment of subgingival root lesions.
    Dragoo MR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Dec; 16(6):594-601. PubMed ID: 9242097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Root surface treatment with glass ionomers and resin composites.
    Erickson RL
    Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):279-85. PubMed ID: 7986453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of four in vitro marginal leakage tests applied to root surface restorations.
    Chan MF; Jones JC
    J Dent; 1992 Oct; 20(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 1280658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
    Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of root restorations.
    Wenner KK; Fairhurst CW; Morris CF; Hawkins IK; Ringle RD
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Dec; 117(7):825-8. PubMed ID: 3060508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage comparison of dentin bonding systems with glass ionomer.
    Chohayeb AA
    Dent Mater; 1992 Jan; 8(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 1521681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of four adhesive materials in the treatment of cervical lesions.
    Negri P
    Minerva Stomatol; 1999 Jun; 48(6 Suppl 1):65-71. PubMed ID: 10549220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.