These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8181643)

  • 1. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets. 2. The effect of back-scattered radiation on radiographic contrast when the density is maintained at an optimum level.
    Price C
    Br Dent J; 1972 Oct; 133(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 4510027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets. 1. Factors affecting the intensity of back-scattered radiation and the effect of this radiation on radiographic contrast when density is allowed to increase.
    Price C
    Br Dent J; 1972 Oct; 133(7):300-4. PubMed ID: 4509449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blackening of unprotected dental X-ray films due to scattered radiation.
    Sewerin IB; Stoltze K
    Scand J Dent Res; 1988 Apr; 96(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 3162601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Lead foil artifacts as a result of unintentional bending of dental X-ray films].
    Sewerin I
    Tandlaegebladet; 1990 Sep; 94(12):483-6. PubMed ID: 2244316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristic curves of dental x-ray film.
    Havukainen R; Servomaa A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jul; 62(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 3460001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiological characteristics of lead foils in dental film packets: analysis of components and shielding effect.
    Araki K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1397446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
    Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing transmitted radiation in dental radiography.
    Bourgeois M; Wood RE; Pharoah MJ
    Health Phys; 1992 Jun; 62(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 1628986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.