These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8181653)
41. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector. Kitagawa H; Farman AG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The role of direct intraoral sensors in the provision of endodontic services. Lavelle CL Endod Dent Traumatol; 1999 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10219147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography. Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors. Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review. Wenzel A Int Dent J; 1993 Apr; 43(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 8320010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [A study of the necessity of cooling of charge-coupled devices in x-ray imaging systems]. Morgun ON; Nemchenko KE; Rogov IuV Med Tekh; 2006; (1):15-9. PubMed ID: 16610280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Intraoral digital radiography. Alder ME Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 8633303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [The improved design of table operating box of digital subtraction angiography device]. Qi X; Zhang M; Han F; Tang F; He L Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 26(6):1211-3. PubMed ID: 20095470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10207454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Doses under automatic exposure control (AEC) for direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-ray systems. Bowden L; Faulkner R; Clancy C; Gallagher A; Devine M; Gorman D; O'Reilly G; Dowling A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):210-4. PubMed ID: 21937592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Short communication: charge-coupled device camera optical density range enhancement and the effect on radiographic image segmentation. Chester EG; Sharif BS; Owen JP Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):59-63. PubMed ID: 8785622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system. Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors. Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Advances in diagnostic imaging in dentistry. Brooks SL; Miles DA Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jan; 37(1):91-111. PubMed ID: 8416826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Lens distortion in optically coupled digital x-ray imaging. Liu H; Jiang H; Fajardo LL; Karellas A; Chen WR Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):906-12. PubMed ID: 10841393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems. Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction. Anissi HD; Geibel MA Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography]. Okano T; Yoda E Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Performance characteristics of a real-time digital x-ray fluoroscopic system using an intensified charge injection device camera and CsI:Na crystal. Atari NA Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):862-72. PubMed ID: 2586372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]