107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8181828)
1. Nonlinear finite element contact analysis of dental implant components.
Sakaguchi RL; Borgersen SE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 8181828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of passive fit absence in the prosthesis/implant/retaining screw system: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 20(6):2000-5. PubMed ID: 19881380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws.
Sakaguchi RL; Borgersen SE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 7615325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of ceramic abutment-restoration combinations for osseointegrated implants.
Papavasiliou G; Tripodakis AP; Kamposiora P; Strub JR; Bayne SC
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 8957860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deflection of superstructure and stress concentrations in the IMZ implant system.
Holmes DC; Haganman CR; Aquilino SA
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 7916889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical analysis of a dental implant system preloaded with a washer.
Versluis A; Korioth TW; Cardoso AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10379106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of load cycling on metal ceramic screw-retained implant restorations with unrestored and restored screw access holes.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18182181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
