These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8182467)

  • 1. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.
    Shadmehr R; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurosci; 1994 May; 14(5 Pt 2):3208-24. PubMed ID: 8182467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models.
    Jansen-Osmann P; Richter S; Konczak J; Kalveram KT
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Mar; 143(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 11880897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field.
    Lai EJ; Hodgson AJ; Milner TE
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Nov; 153(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 12955384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position-dependent perturbation.
    Hinder MR; Milner TE
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 165(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15856204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments?
    Karniel A; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    Biol Cybern; 2003 Jul; 89(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 12836029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching.
    Yang JF; Scholz JP; Latash ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 16874517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations.
    Malfait N; Shiller DM; Ostry DJ
    J Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 22(22):9656-60. PubMed ID: 12427820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.
    Conditt MA; Gandolfo F; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):554-60. PubMed ID: 9242306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields.
    Bhushan N; Shadmehr R
    Biol Cybern; 1999 Jul; 81(1):39-60. PubMed ID: 10434390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm.
    Dizio P; Lackner JR
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1787-92. PubMed ID: 8989414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm?
    Kluzik J; Diedrichsen J; Shadmehr R; Bastian AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1455-64. PubMed ID: 18596187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.
    Thoroughman KA; Shadmehr R
    J Neurosci; 1999 Oct; 19(19):8573-88. PubMed ID: 10493757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses.
    Wang T; Dordevic GS; Shadmehr R
    Biol Cybern; 2001 Dec; 85(6):437-48. PubMed ID: 11762234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.
    Scheidt RA; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Conditt MA; Rymer WZ; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):853-62. PubMed ID: 10938312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements.
    Shadmehr R; Moussavi ZM
    J Neurosci; 2000 Oct; 20(20):7807-15. PubMed ID: 11027245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.
    Franklin DW; Osu R; Burdet E; Kawato M; Milner TE
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3270-82. PubMed ID: 14615432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Actions and consequences in bimanual interaction are represented in different coordinate systems.
    Bays PM; Wolpert DM
    J Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 26(26):7121-6. PubMed ID: 16807341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent adaptation of force and impedance in the redundant muscle system.
    Tee KP; Franklin DW; Kawato M; Milner TE; Burdet E
    Biol Cybern; 2010 Jan; 102(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 19936778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Sensorimotor System Can Sculpt Behaviorally Relevant Representations for Motor Learning.
    Franklin DW; Batchelor AV; Wolpert DM
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 27588304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.