BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8182467)

  • 1. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.
    Shadmehr R; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurosci; 1994 May; 14(5 Pt 2):3208-24. PubMed ID: 8182467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models.
    Jansen-Osmann P; Richter S; Konczak J; Kalveram KT
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Mar; 143(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 11880897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field.
    Lai EJ; Hodgson AJ; Milner TE
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Nov; 153(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 12955384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position-dependent perturbation.
    Hinder MR; Milner TE
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 165(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15856204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments?
    Karniel A; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    Biol Cybern; 2003 Jul; 89(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 12836029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching.
    Yang JF; Scholz JP; Latash ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 16874517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations.
    Malfait N; Shiller DM; Ostry DJ
    J Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 22(22):9656-60. PubMed ID: 12427820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.
    Conditt MA; Gandolfo F; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):554-60. PubMed ID: 9242306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields.
    Bhushan N; Shadmehr R
    Biol Cybern; 1999 Jul; 81(1):39-60. PubMed ID: 10434390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm.
    Dizio P; Lackner JR
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1787-92. PubMed ID: 8989414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm?
    Kluzik J; Diedrichsen J; Shadmehr R; Bastian AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1455-64. PubMed ID: 18596187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.
    Thoroughman KA; Shadmehr R
    J Neurosci; 1999 Oct; 19(19):8573-88. PubMed ID: 10493757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses.
    Wang T; Dordevic GS; Shadmehr R
    Biol Cybern; 2001 Dec; 85(6):437-48. PubMed ID: 11762234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.
    Scheidt RA; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Conditt MA; Rymer WZ; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):853-62. PubMed ID: 10938312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements.
    Shadmehr R; Moussavi ZM
    J Neurosci; 2000 Oct; 20(20):7807-15. PubMed ID: 11027245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.
    Franklin DW; Osu R; Burdet E; Kawato M; Milner TE
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3270-82. PubMed ID: 14615432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Actions and consequences in bimanual interaction are represented in different coordinate systems.
    Bays PM; Wolpert DM
    J Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 26(26):7121-6. PubMed ID: 16807341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent adaptation of force and impedance in the redundant muscle system.
    Tee KP; Franklin DW; Kawato M; Milner TE; Burdet E
    Biol Cybern; 2010 Jan; 102(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 19936778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Sensorimotor System Can Sculpt Behaviorally Relevant Representations for Motor Learning.
    Franklin DW; Batchelor AV; Wolpert DM
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 27588304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.