These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8182827)
21. View from the Nation's Capital. DEA considers relaxing restrictions on medical use of marijuana. Appler WD; Beck DC J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1988 Apr; 8(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 2897379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical marijuana: politics vs patient care. Clarke LK ORL Head Neck Nurs; 2003; 21(4):7. PubMed ID: 14621655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Much ado about marijuana. Voth EA CMAJ; 2001 Sep; 165(5):523. PubMed ID: 11563196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Court decision on medical marijuana use worries patient advocates. Krisberg K Nations Health; 2005 Aug; 35(6):1,14. PubMed ID: 16130240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Legal status of marijuana. Gingrich N JAMA; 1982 Mar; 247(11):1563. PubMed ID: 7062450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. State medical marijuana laws: understanding the laws and their limitations. Pacula RL; Chriqui JF; Reichmann DA; Terry-McElrath YM J Public Health Policy; 2002; 23(4):413-39. PubMed ID: 12532682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. No green light yet. A long-awaited report supports medical marijuana. So now what? Kalb C Newsweek; 1999 Mar; 133(13):35. PubMed ID: 10346464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Pain: no medical necessity defense for marijuana to controlled substances act. Halpern A J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(3-4):410-1. PubMed ID: 12056381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Justices say doctors may not be punished for recommending medical marijuana. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 14610768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. High court hears arguments on legality of medical marijuana. AIDS Policy Law; 2001 Apr; 16(7):8-9. PubMed ID: 11683066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Readers' responses to "it is time for marijuana to be reclassified as something other than a schedule I drug". Rathbone DZ MedGenMed; 2005 Nov; 7(4):35; author reply 34. PubMed ID: 16614657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Readers' responses to "it is time for marijuana to be reclassified as something other than a schedule I drug". Verhaagh DJ MedGenMed; 2005; 7(4):35; author reply 34. PubMed ID: 16671172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Readers' responses to "it is time for marijuana to be reclassified as something other than a schedule I drug". MedGenMed; 2005; 7(4):35; author reply 34. PubMed ID: 16671164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Readers' responses to "it is time for marijuana to be reclassified as something other than a schedule I drug". Csermak B MedGenMed; 2005; 7(4):35; author reply 34. PubMed ID: 16671165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Readers' responses to "it is time for marijuana to be reclassified as something other than a schedule I drug". Voth EA MedGenMed; 2005; 7(4):35; author reply 34. PubMed ID: 16671166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Readers' responses to "it is time for marijuana to be reclassified as something other than a schedule I drug". Helf S MedGenMed; 2005; 7(4):35; author reply 34. PubMed ID: 16671167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Readers' responses to "it is time for marijuana to be reclassified as something other than a schedule I drug". Ranes DH MedGenMed; 2005; 7(4):35; author reply 34. PubMed ID: 16671168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]