These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8183358)

  • 1. Credit where due.
    Kee TP
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):270. PubMed ID: 8183358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Credit where due.
    Davies G
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):270. PubMed ID: 8183357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Credit where credit's due.
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7084):591-2. PubMed ID: 16572137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian nurses' views on assignment of publication credit for scholarly and scientific work.
    Butler L; Ginn D
    Can J Nurs Res; 1998; 30(1):171-83. PubMed ID: 9726189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining authorship. Deciding on authorship: giving credit where it is due (and only where it is due).
    DiBartola SP; Hinchcliff KW
    J Vet Intern Med; 2006; 20(4):803-4. PubMed ID: 16955799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bullying in authorship: abusive mentorship and undeserved credit.
    Avila M
    Medwave; 2014 May; 14(4):e5950. PubMed ID: 25383765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research.
    Holaday M; Yost TE
    J Soc Behav Pers; 1995; 10(2):281-91. PubMed ID: 15719502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publishing: Credit where credit is due.
    Allen L; Scott J; Brand A; Hlava M; Altman M
    Nature; 2014 Apr; 508(7496):312-3. PubMed ID: 24745070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific publishing. Are you ready to become a number?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5922):1662-4. PubMed ID: 19325094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists.
    Laurance WF
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Authorship. Writer's cramp.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6356):101. PubMed ID: 1729638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mentoring new nurse authors.
    Sheridan DR; Dowdney DL
    Nurse Author Ed; 1998; 8(2):4, 7-8. PubMed ID: 9616604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Film industry shows how to give credit where due.
    Bywater RP
    Nature; 2002 Mar; 416(6879):365. PubMed ID: 11919601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whodunnit?
    White B
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6649):326. PubMed ID: 9311768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Credit where credit is due.
    Hardy G; Hardy I
    Nutrition; 2005; 21(11-12):1149. PubMed ID: 16308139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postdocs, mentor thyselves.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7031):415. PubMed ID: 15772670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
    Pennock RT
    Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Education. The evolution of postdocs.
    Singer M
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):232. PubMed ID: 15472063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Games people play with authors' names.
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6636):831. PubMed ID: 9202102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rewards of science extend far beyond publication.
    Barres BA
    Nature; 2002 Mar; 416(6879):365. PubMed ID: 11919597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.