These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8183369)

  • 21. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions.
    Poggel DA; Kasten E; Müller-Oehring EM; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 16777076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A unified model for perceptual learning.
    Seitz A; Watanabe T
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2005 Jul; 9(7):329-34. PubMed ID: 15955722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diazepam impairs temporal dynamics of visual attention.
    Boucart M; Waucquier N; Michael GA; Libersa C
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Feb; 15(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 17295590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coherent interaction of dynamical attractors for object-based selective attention.
    Hoshino O
    Biol Cybern; 2003 Aug; 89(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 12905039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution.
    Yeshurun Y
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1375-87. PubMed ID: 15066397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors.
    Carrasco M; Giordano AM; McElree B
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1351-65. PubMed ID: 15066395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of attention and arousal on early responses in striate cortex.
    Poghosyan V; Shibata T; Ioannides AA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 22(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 16029212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing.
    Olivers CN; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatially mediated capacity limits in attentive visual perception.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR; Kramer AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):98-119. PubMed ID: 17196153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: an ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention.
    Luck SJ; Girelli M; McDermott MT; Ford MA
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Jun; 33(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 9212722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.
    Arnell KM; Duncan J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 Mar; 44(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11863322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials.
    Khoe W; Mitchell JF; Reynolds JH; Hillyard SA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(24):3004-14. PubMed ID: 16153678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unique temporal change is the key to attentional capture.
    Mühlenen A; Rempel MI; Enns JT
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Dec; 16(12):979-86. PubMed ID: 16313663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attention scales according to inferred real-world object size.
    Collegio AJ; Nah JC; Scotti PS; Shomstein S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Jan; 3(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 30932061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring attentional demand in continuous dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Nov; 50(4):821-40. PubMed ID: 9518349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention.
    Cole G; Gellatly A; Blurton A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1356-68. PubMed ID: 11766930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A region complexity effect masquerading as object-based attention.
    Chen Z; Cave KR; Basu D; Suresh S; Wiltshire J
    J Vis; 2020 Jul; 20(7):24. PubMed ID: 32692828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.